2016
DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a022079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcriptional Control by the SMADs

Abstract: The transforming growth factor-b (TGF-b) family of ligands elicit their biological effects by initiating new programs of gene expression. The best understood signal transducers for these ligands are the SMADs, which essentially act as transcription factors that are activated in the cytoplasm and then accumulate in the nucleus in response to ligand induction where they bind to enhancer/promoter sequences in the regulatory regions of target genes to either activate or repress transcription. This review focuses o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
256
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 289 publications
(276 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
(151 reference statements)
3
256
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because SMADs have a low binding affinity for DNA, binding generally requires the recruitment of additional transcription factors or epigenetic modifiers 122 . Several binding partners have been previously identified for SMAD2 and SMAD3, including pro-regenerative transcription factors and epigenetic modifiers such as JUN, ATF3, cellular tumour antigen p53 (TP53), p300 HAT and the histone acetyltransferase KAT2B 122 . Whether these interactions occur in neurons after injury and affect transcriptional regulation is yet to be determined.…”
Section: Transcriptional Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because SMADs have a low binding affinity for DNA, binding generally requires the recruitment of additional transcription factors or epigenetic modifiers 122 . Several binding partners have been previously identified for SMAD2 and SMAD3, including pro-regenerative transcription factors and epigenetic modifiers such as JUN, ATF3, cellular tumour antigen p53 (TP53), p300 HAT and the histone acetyltransferase KAT2B 122 . Whether these interactions occur in neurons after injury and affect transcriptional regulation is yet to be determined.…”
Section: Transcriptional Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SMAD3-SMAD4 and SMAD1/5/8-SMAD4 complexes bind to distinct cis regulatory elements and therefore influence expression of different sets of genes. However, SMAD DNA binding affinity is weak and specificity and affinity are influenced by interaction with non-SMAD transcription factors, thereby allowing transcriptional output to reflect the integration of multiple signaling pathways and/or, through interaction with lineage-specific transcription factors, cell-type specificity [106]. How different type I receptors that phosphorylate the same SMAD proteins regulate different gene cohorts and therefore different cellular behaviors is not understood.…”
Section: Alk1 Signaling In Ecsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TGF‐β subfamily cytokines utilize Smad2 and Smad3 as R‐Smads, while BMPs activate Smad1/5/8. Activated R‐Smads form a complex with Smad4, and together they translocate into the nucleus to regulate target gene transcription in collaboration with other transcription factors or co‐factors . In addition, TGF‐β is capable of activating other signaling pathways mediated by PI3K/Akt, MAPKs (EKR1/2, JNKs and p38), PAK2 and Cdc42/RhoA GTPases, among others …”
Section: Cxxc5 Functions As a Signaling Regulator And Mediatormentioning
confidence: 99%