2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.12.099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcriptional Heterogeneity in Naive and Primed Human Pluripotent Stem Cells at Single-Cell Resolution

Abstract: SummaryConventional human embryonic stem cells are considered to be primed pluripotent but can be induced to enter a naive state. However, the transcriptional features associated with naive and primed pluripotency are still not fully understood. Here we used single-cell RNA sequencing to characterize the differences between these conditions. We observed that both naive and primed populations were mostly homogeneous with no clear lineage-related structure and identified an intermediate subpopulation of naive ce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
178
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(189 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(92 reference statements)
10
178
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior to differential expression (DE) analysis, we pooled transcript counts within each cell type and each donor, creating "pseudo-bulk" transcriptomes. This approach has been employed by several single cell transcriptomics studies (31)(32)(33)(34) since it provides robustness to varying numbers and library sizes of cells/nuclei among replicates (donors acting as replicates in our case), provides strong type I error control, and allows the use of bulk RNA-seq DE tools that have been optimized and validated over the course of many years. After pseudobulking, a typically DESeq2 was used to test for differentially expressed genes (DEGs), with batch as a covariate.…”
Section: Differential Expression and Pathway Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to differential expression (DE) analysis, we pooled transcript counts within each cell type and each donor, creating "pseudo-bulk" transcriptomes. This approach has been employed by several single cell transcriptomics studies (31)(32)(33)(34) since it provides robustness to varying numbers and library sizes of cells/nuclei among replicates (donors acting as replicates in our case), provides strong type I error control, and allows the use of bulk RNA-seq DE tools that have been optimized and validated over the course of many years. After pseudobulking, a typically DESeq2 was used to test for differentially expressed genes (DEGs), with batch as a covariate.…”
Section: Differential Expression and Pathway Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No further quality criteria were applied. Data from [22] was downloaded from EMBL-EBI ArrayExpress under the accession number E-MTAB-6819. Human gene names were converted to mouse names using BioMart.…”
Section: Comparisons Between Different Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Epigenetic modifications are mostly associated with changes in gene expression, which were shown to differ between hPSCs grown in different microenvironments (Newman & Cooper, ), as well as between hESCs and hiPSCs (Chin et al , , ) and between primed and naïve hPSCs (Messmer et al , ). However, quantifying the transcriptional levels of genes in the pluripotent state does not directly reveal the underlying mechanism of variability, nor its level of stability and inheritance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%