Transcriptional Regulation Contributes to Prioritized Detoxification of Hydrogen Peroxide over Nitric Oxide

Abstract

Hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) and nitric oxide (NO·) are toxic metabolites that immune cells use to attack pathogens. These antimicrobials can be present at the same time in phagosomes, and it remains unclear how bacteria deal with these insults when simultaneously present. Here, using Escherichia coli, we observed that simultaneous exposure to H 2 O 2 and NO· leads to prioritized detoxification, where enzymatic removal of NO· is impeded until H 2 O 2 has been eliminated. This phenomenon is reminiscent of carbon catabolite repression (CCR), where preferred carbon sources are catabolized prior to less desirable substrates; however, H 2 O 2 and NO· are toxic, growth-inhibitory compounds rather than growth-promoting nutrients. To understand how NO· detoxification is delayed by H 2 O 2 whereas H 2 O 2 detoxification proceeds unimpeded, we confirmed that the effect depended on Hmp, which is the main NO· detoxification enzyme, and used an approach that integrated computational modeling and experimentation to delineate and test potential mechanisms. Plausible interactions included H 2 O 2 -dependent inhibition of hmp transcription and translation, direct inhibition of Hmp catalysis, and competition for reducing equivalents between Hmp and H 2 O 2 -degrading enzymes. Experiments illustrated that Hmp catalysis and NAD(P)H supply were not impaired by H 2 O 2 , whereas hmp transcription and translation were diminished. A dependence of this phenomenon on transcriptional regulation parallels CCR, and we found it to involve the transcriptional repressor NsrR. Collectively, these data suggest that bacterial regulation of growth inhibitor detoxification has similarities to the regulation of growth substrate consumption, which could have ramifications for infectious disease, bioremediation, and biocatalysis from inhibitor-containing feedstocks. IMPORTANCE Bacteria can be exposed to H 2 O 2 and NO· concurrently within phagosomes. In such multistress situations, bacteria could have evolved to simultaneously degrade both toxic metabolites or preferentially detoxify one over the other. Here, we found that simultaneous exposure to H 2 O 2 and NO· leads to prioritized detoxification, where detoxification of NO· is hampered until H 2 O 2 has been eliminated. This phenomenon resembles CCR, where bacteria consume one substrate over others in carbon source mixtures. Further experimentation revealed a central role for transcriptional regulation in the prioritization of H 2 O 2 over NO·, which is also important to CCR. This study suggests that regulatory scenarios observed in bacterial consumption of growth-promoting compound mixtures can be conserved in bacterial detoxification of toxic metabolite mixtures.

DksA-dependent regulation of RpoS contributes to Borrelia burgdorferi tick-borne transmission and mammalian infectivity

“…E . coli dksA mutant strains (Δ dksA ) are unable to grow in minimal media and show a reduced capacity to detoxify hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) [ 61 , 62 ]. We compared the growth of wild-type E .…”

Lifestyle-specificS-nitrosylation of protein cysteine thiols regulatesEscherichia colibiofilm formation and resistance to oxidative stress

“…Protein S-nitrosylation is known to regulate a wide range of critical physiological functions in eukaryotes (Hess et al, 2005;Smith and Marletta, 2012 (Adolfsen et al, 2019). In contrast to KatG, GltD-Cys108 was found to be S-nitrosylated in biofilm conditions.…”

Identification of essential genes forEscherichia coliaryl polyene biosynthesis and function in biofilm formation

“…These additional defenses may overshadow the contribution of aryl polyenes. In the context of infection where the phagosome enclosed bacteria will encounter both H2O2 and NO after the macrophage has activated iNOS, there is a prioritization of H2O2 mitigation by E. coli [43]. Whether aryl polyenes might provide some beneficial effect during acute exposure to ROS and RNS together may be better studied using an in vitro model.…”