2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0074-7696(05)24004-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcriptional regulation of meiosis in budding yeast

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
178
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(186 citation statements)
references
References 185 publications
8
178
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This includes repression of mitotic genes incompatible with meiotic development, activation of genes specifically needed for meiosis and gametogenesis, and adaptation of cell cycle-regulated loci to the meiotic divisions. Although such regulatory functions have typically been attributed to DNA binding transcriptional activators and repressors (27,28), a number of mitotic ncRNAs were recently shown to positively or negatively influence gene expression via changes of histone modification or transcriptional interference (17,(29)(30)(31)(32). It is therefore conceivable that developmentally regulated ncRNAs such as MUTs contribute to the control of genes required for, for example, cytokinesis (CHS2) and the mitotic cell cycle (CLN3, HUG1) through similar mechanisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes repression of mitotic genes incompatible with meiotic development, activation of genes specifically needed for meiosis and gametogenesis, and adaptation of cell cycle-regulated loci to the meiotic divisions. Although such regulatory functions have typically been attributed to DNA binding transcriptional activators and repressors (27,28), a number of mitotic ncRNAs were recently shown to positively or negatively influence gene expression via changes of histone modification or transcriptional interference (17,(29)(30)(31)(32). It is therefore conceivable that developmentally regulated ncRNAs such as MUTs contribute to the control of genes required for, for example, cytokinesis (CHS2) and the mitotic cell cycle (CLN3, HUG1) through similar mechanisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The down-regulation of Gsk3b is interesting, since its homolog gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Rim11p (regulator of inducer of meiosis), is pivotal for the control of meiosis entry in response to nutritional signals (RubinBejerano et al, 2004;Kassir et al, 2003). Moreover, in vitro experiments have shown that Gsk3b inhibitors suppress DNA synthesis selectively in rat preleptotene spermatocytes, suggesting that Gsk3b might be required for the last round of DNA synthesis preceding meiosis (Guo et al, 2003).…”
Section: Control Of Differentiation and Meiotic Entrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, in S. cerevisiae, nutritional signaling pathways converge on transcriptional activation of the Ime1 gene, which encodes a transcription factor that, in turn, triggers initiation of meiosis, by turning off the expression of genes required for the mitotic cell cycle, while activating the expression of other genes which are crucial for execution of the meiotic program (Kassir et al, 2003). Thus, it is tempting to speculate that one of the effects of KL/kit interaction in differentiating spermatogonia is to establish progressively, during their mitotic divisions, a sort of endogenous state of nutritional stress, which might be the ancestrally inherited trigger for transcription of a master transcriptional regulator of meiosis.…”
Section: Metabolismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five of the proteins required for DSB formation (Spo11, Mei4, Rec102, Rec104, and Rec114) are meiosis-specific and their expression is controlled primarily by transcription (reviewed in Kassir et al 2003). Mer2 (also known as Rec107) is also meiotically induced, but its expression is controlled differently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%