2015
DOI: 10.1186/s12883-015-0495-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcriptional response to interferon beta-1a treatment in patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis

Abstract: BackgroundInterferon (IFN) beta-1a is an approved treatment for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and has been examined for use in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS). However, no information regarding blood transcriptional changes induced by IFN treatment in SPMS patients is available. Our aim was to identify a subgroup of SPMS patients presenting a gene expression signature similar to that of RRMS patients who are clinical responders to IFN treatment.MethodsSPMS patients (n = 50, 20 I… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Of note, there is no known association between latitude and prevalence of neuromyelitis optica, an MS-related disease that worsens upon IFN-β therapy ( 48 ). In the present analysis, the type I IFN genes found to be regulated have previously been identified to be regulated upon IFN-β therapy in RRMS patients who were classified as IFN-β therapy responders ( 49 , 50 ). The down-regulation of AHR and TIPARP , known counter-actors of type I IFN-signaling, further supports a direct up-regulation of type I IFNs through phototherapy ( 51 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Of note, there is no known association between latitude and prevalence of neuromyelitis optica, an MS-related disease that worsens upon IFN-β therapy ( 48 ). In the present analysis, the type I IFN genes found to be regulated have previously been identified to be regulated upon IFN-β therapy in RRMS patients who were classified as IFN-β therapy responders ( 49 , 50 ). The down-regulation of AHR and TIPARP , known counter-actors of type I IFN-signaling, further supports a direct up-regulation of type I IFNs through phototherapy ( 51 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…If part of the effect of UVR is mediated directly through type I interferons, it is possible that IFN-β treatment could mask the effects of UVR / latitude. In fact, the type I interferon genes found to be regulated have previously been shown to be regulated upon IFN-β therapy in RRMS patients who were classified as IFN-β therapy responders (48, 49). The downregulation of AHR and TIPARP , known counter-actors of type I interferons-signaling, further supports a direct upregulation of type I interferons through phototherapy (50).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, as in most studies of this type ( 41 44 ), the PBMCs are considered as a valid cellular group since they are able to reflect patterns of expression characteristic of certain diseases and treatment effects. The majority of studies evaluating the transcriptomic effect of a treatment do it on whole PBMCs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of studies evaluating the transcriptomic effect of a treatment do it on whole PBMCs. In fact, the changes in expression levels on PBMCs in patients with MS treated with IFN-β are known as IFN signature and it has been proposed as a response marker ( 44 ). In addition, a recent study showed that the transcriptional change induced by fingolimod belong almost entirely to CD4 lymphocytes and based on these results, the efficiency of the sorting could be lower than the analysis of the entire population of PBMCs ( 45 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%