2002
DOI: 10.1006/geno.2002.6836
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcriptome Analysis of Monocytic Leukemia Cell Differentiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
59
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
5
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CREG is a secreted glycoprotein and strikingly, addition of CREG-enriched media to NTERA-2 cells promoted the appearance of neuronal differentiation markers even in the absence of an inducer such as RA (Veal et al, 2000). A number of studies, including our own, have reported the induction of CREG mRNA during differentiation of diverse cell types such as pluripotent mouse ES cells (Veal et al, 2000), monocytes (Piquemal et al, 2002), and myeloid cells (Ma et al, 2002). In addition, in a study of variations in gene expression during mouse CNS development, CREG was found in a cluster of genes whose expression is inversely correlated with cyclin D1 expression (Miki et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…CREG is a secreted glycoprotein and strikingly, addition of CREG-enriched media to NTERA-2 cells promoted the appearance of neuronal differentiation markers even in the absence of an inducer such as RA (Veal et al, 2000). A number of studies, including our own, have reported the induction of CREG mRNA during differentiation of diverse cell types such as pluripotent mouse ES cells (Veal et al, 2000), monocytes (Piquemal et al, 2002), and myeloid cells (Ma et al, 2002). In addition, in a study of variations in gene expression during mouse CNS development, CREG was found in a cluster of genes whose expression is inversely correlated with cyclin D1 expression (Miki et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Bioinformatic comparisons [30] in several genomic databases (Unigen, Tigr) allowed firstly to identify the different activated and inactivated tags (known genes, EST or unknown genes) and secondly to compare their respective frequencies in both D0L and MPL libraries.…”
Section: The Sage Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For comparison between libraries, tags with a sum of occurrences below 10 in the two compared sets or with a P>0.005 were discarded. P-value determination was performed as previously described (Piquemal et al, 2002). Tags were mapped using the short sequence mapping tools SeqMap (Jiang and Wong, 2008) and MPscan (Rivals et al, 2009) against the Smed454_90edb transcriptome dataset (Abril et al, 2010).…”
Section: Construction Sequencing and Analysis Of The Dge Librariesmentioning
confidence: 99%