2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00203-019-01635-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcriptome analysis of Rhodobacter capsulatus grown on different nitrogen sources

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, 37 putative keystone taxa have higher average relative abundance (ranging from 0.01 to 0.38%) in the reducing high-As groundwater samples, namely, Pseudomonas (number of putative keystone taxa, 8), Sphingomonas (5), Rheinheimera (4), Vogesella (3), Acidovorax (2), Sphingopyxis (1), Novosphingobium (1), Erythrobacter (1), Sphingobium (1), Bacteriovorax (1), and unclassified genera from Planctomycetes (3), Sphingomonadales (1), Alphaproteobacteria (1), Sphingomonadales (1), Rhodobacteraceae (1), Nitrospirae (1), Micrococcaceae (1), and Caulobacterales (1) (Figure c). Members of the genera Pseudomonas, Sphingomonas , Enhydrobacter , and the family Rhodobacteraceae have been found to participate in ammonium oxidation, Fe­(III) reduction, and/or As-related metabolism (As tolerance, As methylation, As­(V) reduction, and As­(III) oxidation). Genera from the Planctomycetes are widely reported to be capable of anaerobic ammonium oxidation . Therefore, these putative keystone taxa may critically contribute to and/or respond to the groundwater As enrichment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, 37 putative keystone taxa have higher average relative abundance (ranging from 0.01 to 0.38%) in the reducing high-As groundwater samples, namely, Pseudomonas (number of putative keystone taxa, 8), Sphingomonas (5), Rheinheimera (4), Vogesella (3), Acidovorax (2), Sphingopyxis (1), Novosphingobium (1), Erythrobacter (1), Sphingobium (1), Bacteriovorax (1), and unclassified genera from Planctomycetes (3), Sphingomonadales (1), Alphaproteobacteria (1), Sphingomonadales (1), Rhodobacteraceae (1), Nitrospirae (1), Micrococcaceae (1), and Caulobacterales (1) (Figure c). Members of the genera Pseudomonas, Sphingomonas , Enhydrobacter , and the family Rhodobacteraceae have been found to participate in ammonium oxidation, Fe­(III) reduction, and/or As-related metabolism (As tolerance, As methylation, As­(V) reduction, and As­(III) oxidation). Genera from the Planctomycetes are widely reported to be capable of anaerobic ammonium oxidation . Therefore, these putative keystone taxa may critically contribute to and/or respond to the groundwater As enrichment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding Cetobacterium and Rhodobacter , no reports in vinegar have been found for these microorganisms, but because they were present in most of the samples, mainly in those taken along the acetification process, they might play a prominent role in the microbial community. These genera have been associated with the use of diverse strategies for the production and assimilation of acetate, respectively ( Erkal et al, 2019 ; Bhute et al, 2020 ; Xie et al, 2022 ). Conversely, the presence of Bacillus (e.g., Bacillus amyloliquefaciens ) has been previously reported in vinegar, concretely, Zhang et al (2017) showed that they may contribute to the production of acetoin and tetramethylpyrazine, thus enhancing the organoleptic properties, mainly the flavor, of final Chinese vinegars.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%