2021
DOI: 10.1080/21655979.2021.1987081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcriptomic analyses and experimental verification reveal potential biomarkers and biological pathways of urinary tract infection

Abstract: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common infectious disease. Urinary tract pathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) is the main cause of UTIs. At present, antibiotics are mainly used for the treatment of UTIs. However, with the increase of drug resistance, the course of the disease is prolonged. Therefore, identifying the receptors and signal pathways of host cells and tissues will further our understanding of the pathogenesis of UTIs and help in the development of new drug treatments. We used two public microarray… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A previous retrospective analysis identified the characteristics of pathogens associated with catheter-related UTI by reviewing and analyzing relevant data from patients, including demographic, clinical, and microbiological data; the authors then constructed a predictive model with a sensitivity of <40% and a specificity of >90%. The sensitivity of this model for clinical prediction was low; therefore, it is necessary to develop more refined and sensitive tools [ 66 ]. The accuracy (AUC) of the predictive model developed in the present study was 0.8729, the sensitivity was 80%, the specificity was 83.3%, and the classification effect was good.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previous retrospective analysis identified the characteristics of pathogens associated with catheter-related UTI by reviewing and analyzing relevant data from patients, including demographic, clinical, and microbiological data; the authors then constructed a predictive model with a sensitivity of <40% and a specificity of >90%. The sensitivity of this model for clinical prediction was low; therefore, it is necessary to develop more refined and sensitive tools [ 66 ]. The accuracy (AUC) of the predictive model developed in the present study was 0.8729, the sensitivity was 80%, the specificity was 83.3%, and the classification effect was good.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%