2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2019.08.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcriptomic analyses of gene expression by CRISPR knockout of miR-214 in cervical cancer cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SP3 binds GT-and GC-box promoter elements and competes with SP1 for binding the GC-box promoter-a mechanism that regulates gene transcription [35]. SP3 is dysregulated in various cancers and is highly expressed in HCC [36][37][38][39]. Sp3 decreases the sensitivity of Hep3B cells to chemotherapy, and it uses MALAT1 to regulate HCC [39,40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SP3 binds GT-and GC-box promoter elements and competes with SP1 for binding the GC-box promoter-a mechanism that regulates gene transcription [35]. SP3 is dysregulated in various cancers and is highly expressed in HCC [36][37][38][39]. Sp3 decreases the sensitivity of Hep3B cells to chemotherapy, and it uses MALAT1 to regulate HCC [39,40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dysregulation or dysfunction of miRNAs may participate in the progression of cancer, manifesting the intimate correlations with the development, progression and prognosis of cervical cancer. At present, enormous studies are investigating the relationship between cervical cancer and miRNAs, including miR-137, miR-574-5p and miR-21, and involvement of these miRNAs in the development and progression of cervical cancer (3,21,27). But there remains no evidence suggesting the molecular mechanism of miRNA in the development and progression of cervical cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expression levels of these different types of RNA transcripts from Notch2-shRNA treated samples were compared with control samples. The differentially expressed transcripts from treated samples were identified using Cuff Diff pipeline with a fold change cutoff of ≥ 1.5 and a student t-test P-value of ≤ 0.05 upon treatment [29,30]. From this analysis, we have identified 1,067 statistically significant transcripts.…”
Section: Distribution Of Dets Based On Transcript Typementioning
confidence: 99%