2009
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2009.839.76
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcriptomic Analysis of Ethylene-Induced Tolerance to Non-Chilling Peel Pitting in Citrus Fruit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The situation may not be simple, as ethylene stimulates respiration in citrus fruit (McCollum and Maul,2007) and therefore might enhance sucrose consumption (Holland et al,2002). Nevertheless, it should be kept in mind that under our experimental conditions the ethylene‐induced rises in respiration and membrane deterioration are noticeably lower than those induced by 1‐MCP, and that 1‐MCP inhibits ethylene perception and hence may block other protective mechanisms induced by ethylene (Establés‐Ortíz et al,2009; González‐Candelas et al,2010) that would not be easily detected by ultrastructural analysis. Interestingly, oxidative stress has been related to ethylene‐induced acclimation of plants to stress (Lee et al,1998; Munné‐Bosch et al,2004), and previous observations highlight the importance of the antioxidant enzymatic system in the protective effect of ethylene in reducing peel collapse in citrus fruit (Cajuste and Lafuente,2007; Sala and Lafuente,2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The situation may not be simple, as ethylene stimulates respiration in citrus fruit (McCollum and Maul,2007) and therefore might enhance sucrose consumption (Holland et al,2002). Nevertheless, it should be kept in mind that under our experimental conditions the ethylene‐induced rises in respiration and membrane deterioration are noticeably lower than those induced by 1‐MCP, and that 1‐MCP inhibits ethylene perception and hence may block other protective mechanisms induced by ethylene (Establés‐Ortíz et al,2009; González‐Candelas et al,2010) that would not be easily detected by ultrastructural analysis. Interestingly, oxidative stress has been related to ethylene‐induced acclimation of plants to stress (Lee et al,1998; Munné‐Bosch et al,2004), and previous observations highlight the importance of the antioxidant enzymatic system in the protective effect of ethylene in reducing peel collapse in citrus fruit (Cajuste and Lafuente,2007; Sala and Lafuente,2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Interestingly, oxidative stress has been related to ethylene‐induced acclimation of plants to stress (Lee et al,1998; Munné‐Bosch et al,2004), and previous observations highlight the importance of the antioxidant enzymatic system in the protective effect of ethylene in reducing peel collapse in citrus fruit (Cajuste and Lafuente,2007; Sala and Lafuente,2004). Likewise, ethylene treatments that are effective in reducing damage activate phenylpropanoid metabolism (Cajuste and Lafuente,2007; Establés‐Ortíz et al,2009), while a number of Citrus flavonoids act against harmful reactive oxygen species (Benavente‐García et al,1997). In this context, it is interesting to note that the ethylene treatments assayed in the present work favored not only the deposition of pectic polysaccharides substances in the peel, which indicates a cell wall reaction to a persistent slow intercellular oxidative process in plants (Günthardt‐Goerg and Vollenweider,2007), but also other oxidative stress‐related mechanisms, such as starch mobilization and the alteration of cuticle and vacuole (Asensi‐Fabado et al,2010; Günthardt‐Goerg and Vollenweider,2007; Reig‐Armiñana et al,2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that transient increase in ethylene production upon transfer was more acute as fruits matured (Figure 3), similarly to the increase in peel damage (Figure 2), but not in green tissues which possess better ability to adjust water status, supports this idea. The involvement of ethylene in the protection to rind staining in Navel oranges has been suggested, as an exogenous application of the gas for 4 days has been shown to reduce incidence of the blemish (Cajuste and Lafuente, 2007) and inhibition of its action by 1-MCP exacerbated peel pitting (Estables et al. 2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have observed that changes in RH during postharvest storage were associated with a marked increase in respiration and ethylene production, which appears to be wound-related responses (Alferez et al., 2003). Interestingly, exposure of Navel fruit to exogenous ethylene for few days reduced incidence of the damage (Cajuste et al., 2007) and contrary, a pre-treatment with the ethylene action inhibitor 1-MCP accelerated and increased severity of the disorder (Estables et al., 2009), suggesting that the ethylene is part of the fruit defense response to cope with postharvest stress conditions inducing peel pitting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, the severe peel damage in the 1-MCP-treated fruit was accompanied by marked changes in the expression of genes related to programmed cell death belonging to the ubiquitination and proteosome pathways, resembling the plant's defense response in an incompatible interaction (Establés-Ortiz et al, 2009). In Citrus, non-chilling peel pitting is reduced by treatment with 10 μl/l ethylene during storage at 22 C and 90À95% RH; counter-wise peel damage is enhanced by 1-MCP.…”
Section: Ethylene and Ethylene Antagonistsmentioning
confidence: 96%