2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsi.2017.05.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcriptomic variation of locally-infected skin of Epinephelus coioides reveals the mucosal immune mechanism against Cryptocaryon irritans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the development of next-generation high-throughput sequencing technique, RNA-seq has also been applied in the studies of the fish- C. irritans interaction. Two recent reports have examined the transcriptome of C. irritans infected large yellow croaker ( Larimichthys crocea ) in IR tissues through RNA-seq [ 6 , 22 ], and a transcriptomic variation analysis on the C. irritans locally-infected skin of orange-spotted grouper ( Epinephelus coioides ) has been reported [ 23 ]. These data provide a frame of reference to enhance our understanding of the mechanisms of immunity of fish to C. irritans infection at the molecular level, by combining a variety of bioinformatic analyses, such as evolutionary genealogy of genes: non-supervised orthologous groups (eggNOG), gene ontology (GO), and Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the development of next-generation high-throughput sequencing technique, RNA-seq has also been applied in the studies of the fish- C. irritans interaction. Two recent reports have examined the transcriptome of C. irritans infected large yellow croaker ( Larimichthys crocea ) in IR tissues through RNA-seq [ 6 , 22 ], and a transcriptomic variation analysis on the C. irritans locally-infected skin of orange-spotted grouper ( Epinephelus coioides ) has been reported [ 23 ]. These data provide a frame of reference to enhance our understanding of the mechanisms of immunity of fish to C. irritans infection at the molecular level, by combining a variety of bioinformatic analyses, such as evolutionary genealogy of genes: non-supervised orthologous groups (eggNOG), gene ontology (GO), and Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In response to C. irritans infection, skin, gills, head kidney, spleen and liver are believed to be the most important immune responsive tissues [ 17 ]. Skin showed a local immune response against C. irritans infection [ 23 ]. Liver from C. irritans -immunized L. crocea was the first tissue examined with respect to a comparative gene transcription analysis [ 22 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transcriptome analysis of fish skin has been carried out to study the mucosal immunity using a model fish parasite Cryptocaryon irritans (Hu et al . ). This study emphasizes the significance of the skin's local immune response in fish defence against ectoparasite infection.…”
Section: Current Status Of Transcriptomics In Aquaculturementioning
confidence: 97%
“…A total of 337, 407 GO terms were assigned to 37,103 unigenes (39.15% of the total assembled sequences). The numbers of mapped GO terms for biological process, molecular function and cellular component were (172,651, 51.17%), (47,757,14.15%) and (116,999, 34.68%), respectively. Within the biological process category, contigs involved in cellular process (27,381,15.86%) and single-organism process (22,494,13.03%) were highly represented.…”
Section: Gene Ontology (Go) and Kyoto Encyclopedia Of Genes And Genommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although skin is an important component of the mucosal immune system, a few studies on the skin transcription profile have been characterized in fish [10][11][12]. Evidence is accumulating that skin is a peripheral immune organ in teleosts [2,13,14]. However, there is a lack of genomic information such as the skin transcriptome of crucian carp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%