1988
DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(88)90242-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcutaneous pacing: Experience with the zoll noninvasive temporary pacemaker

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The length of time that pacing wires were left in situ was longer for wires that developed local or systemic infection than those that did not (4 [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The length of time that pacing wires were left in situ was longer for wires that developed local or systemic infection than those that did not (4 [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TCP was found to be relatively safe and adverse events were limited to chest discomfort, which is similar to what has been seen in other clinical studies. 3,[9][10][11]13,14,22 The observed TCP mechanical capture rates of 88% are higher than previously reported rates of 19% in a controlled trial 3 and 86% in a case series. 10 The field logistics coordinator played an important role in stocking randomization envelopes and checking vehicles for research-related supplies once a month.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Given the chaotic nature of the prehospital setting, even if paramedics are willing and able to randomize patients, allocation may not be distributed equally across the control and treatment groups. While TCP appears to be safe in the hospital environment, 9,13,14 it might be less safe or less dependable in the field. Moreover, collecting reliable and valid data in this situation may be difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has also proven to be of use in interhospital transport of patients with unstable arrhythmias 8 . Durations of cardiac pacing have been reported as long as 25 hours through the 1980s, but experience with pacing over 1 hour of duration is limited 6,9,10 . In the hospital, however, recommendations are that any patient thought to require more than 20–30 minutes of temporary pacing should have a transvenous wire inserted 11…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%