2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-006-0079-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transdermal application of lovastatin to rats causes profound increases in bone formation and plasma concentrations

Abstract: These results show transdermal application of statins produces greater beneficial effects on bone formation than oral administration does.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
59
1
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
5
59
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect comes directly through activation of bone morphogenic protein (BMP-2) and TGF-b1 (Mundy et al, 1999;Nyan et al, 2010;Stojadinovic et al, 2010) as well as, indirectly by the suppression of osteoclast activity (Hughes et al, 2007;Ayukawa et al, 2009;Luisetto & Camozzi, 2009;Moriyama et al, 2010). Studies proved that this control of bone remodeling process by statins was prominent after subcutaneous, oral and local administration (Oxlund & Andreassen, 2004;Gutierrez et al, 2006;Moriyama et al, 2008). Local application could reduce the side effects and eliminate the doubts about the biodistribution of parenteral and oral statins to bone (Hirabayashi & Fujisaki, 2003;Miyamoto et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect comes directly through activation of bone morphogenic protein (BMP-2) and TGF-b1 (Mundy et al, 1999;Nyan et al, 2010;Stojadinovic et al, 2010) as well as, indirectly by the suppression of osteoclast activity (Hughes et al, 2007;Ayukawa et al, 2009;Luisetto & Camozzi, 2009;Moriyama et al, 2010). Studies proved that this control of bone remodeling process by statins was prominent after subcutaneous, oral and local administration (Oxlund & Andreassen, 2004;Gutierrez et al, 2006;Moriyama et al, 2008). Local application could reduce the side effects and eliminate the doubts about the biodistribution of parenteral and oral statins to bone (Hirabayashi & Fujisaki, 2003;Miyamoto et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Statins target the liver and have reduced affinity for bone tissue; in addition, orally administered statins are poorly distributed to bone. 3 The doses required for statins to have an effect on bone are much higher than those required to reduce cholesterol levels and are associated with unacceptable toxicity. 3 The major limitation to the clinical use of statins for bone regeneration is the lack of an effective carrier for the drug, 4 since the success of in vivo bone formation depends on high local concentrations of statins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 The doses required for statins to have an effect on bone are much higher than those required to reduce cholesterol levels and are associated with unacceptable toxicity. 3 The major limitation to the clinical use of statins for bone regeneration is the lack of an effective carrier for the drug, 4 since the success of in vivo bone formation depends on high local concentrations of statins. 5 Various authors have investigated new methods and carriers for the administration of statins:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vivo, the effects are even more contradictory. Although there are studies which agree with the original findings of Mundy et al (Garrett et al 2001, Oxlund et al 2001, Sugiyama and Kawai 2001, Garrett and Mundy 2002, Kajinami et al 2003, Staal et al 2003, Wong and Rabie 2003, Kawane et al 2004, Stein et al 2005, Gutierrez et al 2006, Garrett et al 2007), some very conscientiously designed studies have not been able to demonstrate any such effects (Maritz et al 2001, von Stechow et al 2003, Yao et al 2006.…”
Section: Statinsmentioning
confidence: 74%