1992
DOI: 10.1016/0168-3659(92)90198-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transdermal controlled delivery of verapamil: determination of in vitro/in vivo relationship

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(6) The body pharmacokinetics is defined to follow two-compartment model (Shah et al, 1992c;Anderson et al, 1982). The two-compartment model for verapamil has been chosen in consistency with previous studies which indicate this to be a better model as compared to the one-compartment model (Bertera et al, 2008;Syvanen et al, 2008).…”
Section: Model Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…(6) The body pharmacokinetics is defined to follow two-compartment model (Shah et al, 1992c;Anderson et al, 1982). The two-compartment model for verapamil has been chosen in consistency with previous studies which indicate this to be a better model as compared to the one-compartment model (Bertera et al, 2008;Syvanen et al, 2008).…”
Section: Model Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This assumption has also been previously explained in detail in Al-Qalaf et al (2009c) and Davidson et al (2008). (8) The back diffusion of verapamil in skin is ignored (Al-Qallaf et al, 2007;Tojo, 2005;Shah et al, 1992c). This has been done since the diffusion coefficient of verapamil is small in the stratum corneum (Shah et al, 1992c).…”
Section: Model Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations