2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11625-016-0376-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transdisciplinary co-design of scientific research agendas: 40 research questions for socially relevant climate engineering research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The goals of the European ERT, as well as those of a previous Japanese ERT [31] that took place in February 2017 [32], read as follows:…”
Section: Identifying Unintended Side Effects Of Digital Transitioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The goals of the European ERT, as well as those of a previous Japanese ERT [31] that took place in February 2017 [32], read as follows:…”
Section: Identifying Unintended Side Effects Of Digital Transitioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A transdisciplinary process [28][29][30], is a knowledge-integration-based, real-world, problem-oriented discourse including representatives from all key stakeholder groups that is intended to generate socially robust orientations on critical issues of sustainable development [28,29]. For instance, the facilitation of the adaptation and/or the mitigation process for those who cannot benefit from the desired advantages of digital transitioning may become the subject of a transdisciplinary process related to the Digital Revolution.The goals of the European ERT, as well as those of a previous Japanese ERT [31] that took place in February 2017 [32], read as follows:• Goal 1: Identify positive or negative unsee(ns) that are linked to digital transitioning; • Goal 2: Reflect on the way(s) in which the unsee(ns) can best become subjects of science in an overarching way; • Goal 3: Project (from the science perspective) which unsee(ns) might become subjects of transdisciplinary processes (i.e., science-practice discourses that relate different types of knowledge in order to efficaciously master complex, relevant societal challenges).The present paper presents and classifies the unseens and compares them with those from a Japanese ERT which took place in February 2017 and develops a bigger picture on sensitive domains which are not yet well understood and which ask for further research policy means. The propositions of Appendix A address the above goals and a basic pillar of this paper.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 In light of such discussions, many scholars argue that there is an urgent need to assess the proposed climate engineering options from social and natural scientific perspectives (Healey and Rayner 2015). Climate engineering is a controversial topic in the scientific debates (Stilgoe 2015). For many observers, the Paris Agreement's 1.5 degree ambition was considered provocative as it requires immediate radical emission cuts and measures that enable net negative emissions to offset the effects of greenhouse gases, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, one should therefore interpret the present results only as indicative. To pursue responsible innovation of AI, we need to revisit the research agenda, along with stakeholders, as has been done in the context of a different emerging technology [64].…”
Section: Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%