2011
DOI: 10.1177/1050651911400710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transdisciplinary ITexts and the Future of Web-Scale Collaboration

Abstract: Changes in Web infrastructure have allowed ITexts to become a vehicle for transdisciplinary Web-scale collaboration so that large-scale teams can create new knowledge despite differences in team members’ disciplinary training, geographic location, and levels of expertise. In this article, the authors define Web-scale collaboration and illustrate the need for transdisciplinary approaches to problem solving. Then they introduce heuristics for creating and evaluating such transdisciplinary, collaborative Web-scal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the second unit of our NYC Evacuation CACS, we have focused on raising critical questions about distribution channels for TC. As demonstrated by our field’s long-standing interest in understanding the specific ways that communication technologies and media outlets shape, enable, and constrain communication (e.g., Fernheimer, Litterio, & Hendler, 2011; Haas, Carr, & Takayoshi, 2011; Ishii, 2005), it is vital for technical communicators to consider not only the content of but also the distribution channels users can turn to to access that communication. Drawing on the framework established in Unit 1 on the social model of disability, we ask students to apply their new critical disability studies perspective to answering questions about how a variety of users might glean technical information about emergencies, such as: How and where do or might people access TC about emergencies? How and where do or might people access vital information during natural disasters and other emergencies? How do distribution channels for technical information affect the accessibility of that information for users with and without disabilities? …”
Section: The Nyc Evacuation Cacsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the second unit of our NYC Evacuation CACS, we have focused on raising critical questions about distribution channels for TC. As demonstrated by our field’s long-standing interest in understanding the specific ways that communication technologies and media outlets shape, enable, and constrain communication (e.g., Fernheimer, Litterio, & Hendler, 2011; Haas, Carr, & Takayoshi, 2011; Ishii, 2005), it is vital for technical communicators to consider not only the content of but also the distribution channels users can turn to to access that communication. Drawing on the framework established in Unit 1 on the social model of disability, we ask students to apply their new critical disability studies perspective to answering questions about how a variety of users might glean technical information about emergencies, such as: How and where do or might people access TC about emergencies? How and where do or might people access vital information during natural disasters and other emergencies? How do distribution channels for technical information affect the accessibility of that information for users with and without disabilities? …”
Section: The Nyc Evacuation Cacsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collaborative tools for annotation democratically model a scholarly primitive that emerged with medieval manuscript culture to assist remembering, thinking, clarifying, sharing, and interpreting (Ovsiannikov, Arbib, & McNeill, 1999;Marshall, 1997;Wolfe, 2002). Blogs and content management systems facilitate user-derived content, implicitly contending that sharing, creativity, and dialogue are intrinsic to knowledge activity Kjellberg, 2010;Fernheimer, Litterio, & Hendler, 2011). Collaborative bibliography tools enhance the scholarly processes they model by heightening social involvement and reflecting the networked nature of thought and scholarship Hendry, Jenkins, & McCarthy, 2006).…”
Section: Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While useful to consider social software within these many and broad divisions, it is most productive in the context of this paper to focus more specifically, Kjellberg (2011), Fernheimer et al (2011), and Hopkins (2010.…”
Section: The General Scope Of Social Software Applicable To the Scholmentioning
confidence: 99%