1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0048-9697(98)00150-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transect survey of radiocesium in soils and plants of two alpine pastures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the linear relationship is probably justified under similar environmental conditions it has been shown to be the exception rather than the rule in statistical treatment of published databases (Albers et al, 1998;Albers et al, 2000;Ehlken and Kirchner, 2002;Schimmack et al, 2003). Thus, recent models to predict soil-to-plant transfer of radionuclides more and more incorporate soil chemical and physical properties, root zone radionuclide availability and soil/soil-solution interactions (Ehlken and Kirchner, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the linear relationship is probably justified under similar environmental conditions it has been shown to be the exception rather than the rule in statistical treatment of published databases (Albers et al, 1998;Albers et al, 2000;Ehlken and Kirchner, 2002;Schimmack et al, 2003). Thus, recent models to predict soil-to-plant transfer of radionuclides more and more incorporate soil chemical and physical properties, root zone radionuclide availability and soil/soil-solution interactions (Ehlken and Kirchner, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the distribution of radiocesium in coniferous forests contaminated by the Chernobyl fallout clearly shows that the soil compartment is the main pool for radiocesium, and within the soil profile the more humic horizons retain most of the radiocesium (Rafferty et al 2000;Ciuffo et al 2002). From a recent determination of the vertical distributions of 137 Cs in the soils at forest sites, it was found that not only Chernobyl-derived radiocesium but also radiocesium from the global fallout of weapons testing deposited mainly in the 1960 s is still very close to the soil surface (0-5 cm depth) and that practically no detectable radiocesium is found below 10 cm depth (Livens et al 1991;Pietrzak-Flis et al 1996;Albers et al 1998;Bunzl et al 2000;Ramzaev et al 2006;Karadeniz and Yaprak 2008a, b). One quite knows that the activity concentrations of long-lived radionuclides in the soil tends to affect that in plants and its further transport into the ecosystem as well as the external dose exposed by man (Schuller et al 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a recent determination of the vertical distribution of 137 Cs and 134 Cs in the soils at various plots along a transect of this pasture, it was found that Chernobyl-derived radiocesium is still very close to the soil surface and is practically not found below a depth of 10 cm (<2%) [2]. In the present study, where we were interested only in the migration rates of Chernobyl-derived radiocesium, we had, however, to distinguish between Chernobyl-derived 137 Cs and 137 Cs from the fallout of global weapon testing, because radiocesium from this source is also still present mainly in this layer.…”
Section: Soil Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this one-dimensional convective-dispersive, local equilibrium, mass transport model the total concentration C t (x, t) of the radionuclide in the soil (mobile and sorbed) at time t and distance x with respect to the concentration C o t of the radionuclide deposited as a single pulse at time t=0 to the soil surface (x=0) is given [7,8,9] as: (1) Here λ is the decay constant of 137 Cs, erfc(ξ)=1-erf(ξ), where erf(ξ) is the error function, (2) where K d is the distribution coefficient of 137 Cs in the soil, ρ the bulk density and ε the porosity of the soil. D and v w are the dispersion coefficient and the mean pore water velocity, respectively.…”
Section: Convection-dispersion Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%