Transecting security and space in Kurdistan, Iraq

Abstract

Departing from most coverage of Iraq, which tends to be focused on insecurity, this paper is about securities; drawing on research in the provinces of Iraq administered by the autonomous Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG). In the last decade, the KRG's territory has experienced very few significant bomb attacks. These were directed against KRG personnel, rather than targeting civilians per se, as so frequently happens elsewhere in Iraq. In contrast, the KRG has enjoyed relative security, enabling fast development. To the southwest however, there is a complex territorial contest between the Peshmerga (armed forces of the KRG), the forces of the central government of Iraq and Islamic State (al-Dawlah al-Islāmīyah -frequently called ISIS or ISIL in English) whose insurgent territory spans the Iraq-Syria border. To the northeast, the Partiya Karkerên Kurdistan (PKK), who have contested the Turkish state since the mid-1980s, now control swathes of territory. Transecting these spaces, the paper develops a grounded study of how Kurdish security forces operate. While insecurity continues in the disputed territories and the Partiya Karkerên Kurdistan governs the zone along the Turkish border, the security forces of the KRG utilize very direct forms of surveillance and control. Negotiating these, our paper traverses spaces of security, sovereignty and (disputed) territory.

Psychogeography: Walking through strategy, nature and narrative

“…In a brief comment on psychogeography, Caitlin DeSilvey and Tim Edensor (2013: 474) record ‘the work of scholars who engage with psychogeography to excavate the uncanny, indeterminate traces that persist in marginal spaces’. But whereas most of those margins are in selected metropolitan cities, others have rendered psychogeography into a mode of purposeful encounter in postsocialist and postcolonial cities in Africa, the Balkans and Asia (Bekteshi and Mino, 2019; Castán Broto et al, 2021; Paasche and Sidaway, 2010, 2015, 2021; Sarma and Sidaway, 2020; Sidaway et al, 2014a, 2014b; Véron, 2016). Psychogeography is invoked too in Ahmed Mater’s (2016) narrative of the makeover of Mecca in the last 15 years.…”

Political geography I: Agency

“…In the study of political violence, the focus on agency enables us to grasp the human cost of violence much beyond the zones and institutions of war-making. It prompts on-the-ground treatments of the everyday in conflict and post-conflict situations (Fluri, 2014; Fregonese, 2017; Paasche and Sidaway, 2015; Sidaway et al, 2014; Woon, 2013) as well as the diffuse operation of the discourses of militarization and violence in everyday life (Pain, 2015; Massaro, 2015). Structural violence operates both through explicit war-making and biopolitically through abandonment: through the neglect of war veterans or first respondents, for example (Gilbert and Ponder, 2014).…”

Securing Urban Frontiers: A View from Yangon, Myanmar

“…These street‐level transects in downtown Yangon were first staged in March 2016 and were repeated on each subsequent visit to the city at different times of the day and evening until our last visit in October 2018. They draw on methods of transecting urban space utilized in three other postcolonial cities; Maputo, Phnom Penh and Erbil (Paasche and Sidaway, ; ; Sidaway et al . ) to map publicly visible manifestations of security and their relationships to the wider city and polity.…”