1987
DOI: 10.1136/jramc-133-03-10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transection of the Retrohepatic Vena Cava in a Case of Total Situs Inversus Following Blunt Trauma

Abstract: Total transection of the retrohepatic inferior vena cava from blunt trauma is a rare and usually fatal injury. Such an injury in a patient with total situs inversus and previous surgical correction of great vessel transposition is described. A possible mechanism for the injury is suggested.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present case SIT was diagnosed preoperatively on a Chest and Abdominal X-rays [8][9][10]. Some difficulties mentioned during the surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present case SIT was diagnosed preoperatively on a Chest and Abdominal X-rays [8][9][10]. Some difficulties mentioned during the surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultrasound easily displays the location of the liver in the left upper quadrant and that the spleen is in the right upper quadrant [15]. Trauma in patients with situs inversus has only rarely been reported [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. To our knowledge there are no case reports of the FAST examination with situs inversus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even in the best of circumstances, with the most skilled of surgeons, the mortality still ranges from 30% to 100% [1,2,5,7,8,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. As is ffequently the case, associated injuries play a Reprint requests: Robert C. Lim, Jr., M.D., Department of Surgery, Ward 3A, San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California 94110, U.S.A. large role in the ultimate determinants of mortality (Table 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%