The clinical value of transesophageal and transthoracic ultrasound examinations
in the assessment of bioprosthetic valve dysfunction was compared in 21
patients (12 with mitral and 9 with aortic bioprosthetic regurgitation). Angiography
was performed in 16 patients, and pathological morphology of valve
malfunction was confirmed by surgery or autopsy. At the mitral position, the
severity of regurgitation and pathomorphology determined by transesophageal
Doppler echocardiography corresponded well to angiographic grading
and surgical or autopsy findings, respectively. The transthoracic imaging
underestimated angiographic regurgitation in 25% of patients and detected
flail motion of valve leaflets in 6 of 9 patients with tom cusps. At the aortic
position, both transesophageal and transthoracic approaches were of similar
value in characterizing the possible cause of regurgitation, but the transthoracic
Doppler approach provided better assessment of the degree of regurgitation.
The study indicates that transesophageal echocardiography and Doppler color
flow imaging are superior to the transthoracic approach in assessing the severity
and cause of bioprosthetic mitral regurgitation but the transthoracic
approach remains useful in the evaluation of aortic bioprosthetic valve dysfunction.