1993
DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-0436.1993.tb01600.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transfection of metastatic capability with total genomic DNA from human and mouse metastatic tumour cell lines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In earlier studies, human DNA transfected into 3T3 cells has been recovered by identification of human specific Alu sequences (Gate et al, 1995;Hayle et al, 1993). Although several oncogenes have been identified by this method, the risk involved in this strategy is that, although Alu sequences are scattered throughout the human genome they are not contained in every fragment of human DNA (only 50% according to probability and depending on the sizes of the fragments).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In earlier studies, human DNA transfected into 3T3 cells has been recovered by identification of human specific Alu sequences (Gate et al, 1995;Hayle et al, 1993). Although several oncogenes have been identified by this method, the risk involved in this strategy is that, although Alu sequences are scattered throughout the human genome they are not contained in every fragment of human DNA (only 50% according to probability and depending on the sizes of the fragments).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been a number of reports in which a spontaneous metastatic phenotype was successfully transferred into normal mouse or rat fibroblasts, or non-metastatic mouse tumor cell lines by transfections involving metastatic human tumor cell DNA and an appropriate selectable marker gene [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. However, in spite of apparent successful acquisition of metastatic competence by the recipient cells, such experiments have not yet led to the identification of novel metastasis-associated genes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, because of the transient nature of the transfected neo-resistance gene, the phenotypic behavior exhibited by the re-established metastatic cell lines could not be attributed conclusively to co-transfected donor DNA sequences. In the final study [1], although experimental metastases (lung colonization following intravenous tumor cell injections) at levels very similar to those caused by the primary transfectants were repeatedly seen following similar injections of successive generations of metastatic cells re-established in culture, the same cells when injected subcutaneously did not produce spontaneous metastatic foci even though tumors developed at the injection sites. This implied that only a portion of the criteria for metastatic progression was being met.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such findings indicate that pulmonary metastasis after inoculation, either s.c. or mfp, or with Matrigel, primarily depends on intrinsic properties of the tumour cells (Fidler, 1978;Tarin & Prince, 1979), but can be modulated by local microenvironmental factors. Recent results (Steeg et al, 1988;Hayle et al, 1993) indicate that metastatic events occur as a result of genetic disturbances which allow the inappropriate expression of genes that are silent in most cells, enabling the cells affected and their progeny to disseminate from the primary site. This new evidence suggests that metastasis may occur as a consequence either of failure of a negative regulatory event responsible for inhibiting inappropriate cell migration and distant colonisation, perhaps involving the nm23 gene (Steeg et al, 1988), or of the activation and up-regulation of a gene capable of dominantly conferring the phenotype (Hayle et al, 1993).…”
Section: Matrigelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent results (Steeg et al, 1988;Hayle et al, 1993) indicate that metastatic events occur as a result of genetic disturbances which allow the inappropriate expression of genes that are silent in most cells, enabling the cells affected and their progeny to disseminate from the primary site. This new evidence suggests that metastasis may occur as a consequence either of failure of a negative regulatory event responsible for inhibiting inappropriate cell migration and distant colonisation, perhaps involving the nm23 gene (Steeg et al, 1988), or of the activation and up-regulation of a gene capable of dominantly conferring the phenotype (Hayle et al, 1993). In any event, once this balance has been disturbed, it appears that microenvironmental influences, such as the site of growth of the tumour cells or the constitution of the adjacent tissue matrix, can accelerate tumour growth and dissemination.…”
Section: Matrigelmentioning
confidence: 99%