“…Furthermore, both of these procedures bring potentially irritating substances into contact with sensitive spinal m e n i n g e~.~.~ Evaluation of L-S spinal canal and cauda equina lesions by vertebral sinus venography (VSV) has been advocated in man6-14 and dogs .2,15-17 Intervertebral disc herniation, traumatic and degenerative L-S instability and malarticulation, L-S spinal canal stenosis, thickening of the ligamentum flavum, discospondylitis, and traumatic or neoplastic spinal vein embolization have been demonstrated using this technic .2,15-20 Several studies comparing the value of VSV versus myelography in diagnosis of caudal lumbar o r L-S disc herniations in man have documented the superiority of VSV.7,9JoJ4,21, 22 VSV has the following advantages: (1) tebral sinuses (VS) are well defined, anatomic structures which lie adjacent to the spinal cord and cauda equina in close contact with the dorsal longitudinal ligament throughout the L-S region , L , 9 3 2 3 and (2) contrast medium injected into the VS is restricted to contact with the intravascular Disadvantages include relative procedural complexity, inconsistent filling of the VS, and difficulties in the interpretation of the plexiform arrangement of the T h e technic of VSV by intraosseous injection of contrast medium has been described in humans .6326327 In recent years the intraosseous technic has, to a large extent, been replaced by selective and superselective catheter v e n~g r a p h y .~-'~, '~, '~ Ad vantages of catheterization are ease of performance, more consistent visualization of the VS, and fewer postprocedural complications . [7][8][9]12,13 Based on the successful use of VSV in humans, several investigators have adapted the intraosseous technic for use in the…”