2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2016.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transfer entropy between multivariate time series

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…. Q X X X X Γ represents the variance of the prediction error of 1 X by using the past of all signals except 2 X .…”
Section: B Granger Causalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…. Q X X X X Γ represents the variance of the prediction error of 1 X by using the past of all signals except 2 X .…”
Section: B Granger Causalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each value of p, the box plots are displayed for the information flow from 1 to 2 (left-hand side) and from 2 to 1 (right-hand side). The null interval between the first and last quartiles obtained for the latter direction can be explained by the thresholding rule introduced to eliminate redundant predictors in kernel Granger method (this leads to a Granger index value equal to zero when none of the linear or nonlinear functions of 2 X implicitly introduced as features in the kernel approach is significantly correlated with the predicted variable).…”
Section: Physiology-based Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This allows the identification of the coupling between different parameters to derive and train descriptive and predictive models. Previous investigations focused on the definition of causality tests using time series (Paluš and Vejmelka, 2007), for instance using transfer entropy (Mao and Shang, 2017). But the understanding of causalities and the successful implementation of models requires a well-founded analysis of the influence of the sampled data 1 , and in some cases the inference of causality can be complicated by a bias in estimation from a limited amount of possibly noisy data (Paluš and Vejmelka, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%