2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00607-010-0128-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transfer function modelling in software reliability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The RMSE 10,11,16,19,28 is frequently used measure of differences between values predicted and the original values defined as:…”
Section: Performance Analysis Of the Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The RMSE 10,11,16,19,28 is frequently used measure of differences between values predicted and the original values defined as:…”
Section: Performance Analysis Of the Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several models available in the literature to measure the reliability of general software. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Unfortunately, these models cannot be applied directly to the Web software due to its some specific nature. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] Specific characteristics those make Web workload measurement different from the traditional software systems are given below:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Various software reliability growth models (SRGMs) are available in the literature to estimate the reliability of software (Pham 2006;Xie 1991;Lyu 1996;Kapur et al 2011;Musa et al 1987;Chatterjee et al 1997Chatterjee et al , 2011bChatterjee et al , 2012. These models are developed based on the failure data gathered during the testing phase of software.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%