2012 American Control Conference (ACC) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/acc.2012.6315333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transfer learning for dynamic RF environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In such tasks, the knowledge from similar scenarios, e.g., frequency bands, can be leveraged to reduce the learning time and improve the prediction accuracy. For example, a transductive TL approach is proposed in [85] to adaptively learn and predict dynamic RF environments. Particularly, a spatio-temporal Gaussian process model is developed to predict the distribution of RF variations.…”
Section: Channel Estimation and Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such tasks, the knowledge from similar scenarios, e.g., frequency bands, can be leveraged to reduce the learning time and improve the prediction accuracy. For example, a transductive TL approach is proposed in [85] to adaptively learn and predict dynamic RF environments. Particularly, a spatio-temporal Gaussian process model is developed to predict the distribution of RF variations.…”
Section: Channel Estimation and Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, a third consideration, and we believe largely an open problem as we look to scale up the deployment of RFML solutions in real-world scenarios is the use of transfer learning [140], [141], where the behaviors learned and observations collected can be shared between sensors, as well as online or incremental learning, where the behaviors learned are modified over time as a function of a changing environment. For example, automated vehicles could benefit greatly from sharing their observations with the neighboring platforms while operating in a Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V)/Vehicle-to-Infrastructure (V2I) environment.…”
Section: A Real World Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because the feature representation may not able to linearly separate the injected signature from the environmental multipath. This can be solved either using transfer learning approaches [47] or using 2 step tranmission for authentication. To further clarify, if the feature representation of the injected signatures made in one room is termed source domain data and the representation in another room is the target domain data, we would want the features learned from the source domain to be valid in the target domain.…”
Section: Enabling Node Movementmentioning
confidence: 99%