2023
DOI: 10.1002/mp.16027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transfer learning framework for low‐dose CT reconstruction based on marginal distribution adaptation in multiscale

Abstract: Background: With the increasing use of computed tomography (CT) in clinical practice, limiting CT radiation exposure to reduce potential cancer risks has become one of the important directions of medical imaging research. As the dose decreases, the reconstructed CT image will be severely degraded by projection noise. Purpose: As an important method of image processing, supervised deep learning has been widely used in the restoration of low-dose CT (LDCT) in recent years. However, the normal-dose CT (NDCT) corr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 150 , 151 with the remaining approaches including filter‐based methods as well as hybrid methods. 152 , 153 , 154 , 155 , 156 , 157 To be noted that some models are originally developed, 61 , 62 , 65 , 66 , 68 , 70 , 72 , 73 , 77 , 122 , 153 while some are developed by modifying original models through modifying loss functions, or layers, or extending original models to different domains. 60 , 63 , 64 , 69 , 71 , 72 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 78 , 82 , 84 , 102 , 121 , 123 , 124 , 125 , 147 , 150 , 151 , 152 , 155 , 158 …”
Section: Dl‐based Noise Reduction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 150 , 151 with the remaining approaches including filter‐based methods as well as hybrid methods. 152 , 153 , 154 , 155 , 156 , 157 To be noted that some models are originally developed, 61 , 62 , 65 , 66 , 68 , 70 , 72 , 73 , 77 , 122 , 153 while some are developed by modifying original models through modifying loss functions, or layers, or extending original models to different domains. 60 , 63 , 64 , 69 , 71 , 72 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 78 , 82 , 84 , 102 , 121 , 123 , 124 , 125 , 147 , 150 , 151 , 152 , 155 , 158 …”
Section: Dl‐based Noise Reduction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, they use techniques such as GANs, VAEs, or self‐supervised learning to estimate the underlying distribution of clean images from the noisy images. Twenty studies 85 , 87 , 120 , 121 , 122 , 127 , 128 , 129 , 130 , 131 , 133 , 135 , 136 , 141 , 143 , 145 , 146 , 148 , 149 , 154 , 158 apply different unsupervised training approaches. Unsupervised DL‐based methods rely on the assumption that the noisy image can be modeled as a combination of a clean image and additive noise, and aim to estimate the clean image from the noisy input.…”
Section: Training Validation and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%