2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-020-05746-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transfer the best and biopsy the rest? Blastocyst euploidy rates differ by morphology and day of biopsy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results showed (Table 2 ) that the chromosome aneuploidy rate of SA-CV in the D6 group was comparable to that of the D5 group. This is inconsistent with the studies of pre-implantation blastocysts, which showed that the aneuploidy rate of D6 blastocysts was significantly higher than that of D5 blastocysts [ 6 , 13 , 14 ]. Possible reasons included maybe as following.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…Our results showed (Table 2 ) that the chromosome aneuploidy rate of SA-CV in the D6 group was comparable to that of the D5 group. This is inconsistent with the studies of pre-implantation blastocysts, which showed that the aneuploidy rate of D6 blastocysts was significantly higher than that of D5 blastocysts [ 6 , 13 , 14 ]. Possible reasons included maybe as following.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…Our results showed (Table 2) that the chromosome aneuploidy rate of SA-CV in the D6 group was comparable to that of the D5 group. This is inconsistent with the studies of preimplantation blastocysts, which showed that the aneuploidy rate of D6 blastocysts was signi cantly higher than that of D5 blastocysts[6, 13,14] Possible reasons included maybe as following.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The association of day of blastocyst formation with aneuploid rates has been extensively studied, illustrating an increasing prevalence of aneuploidy from day 5 to day 7 blastocysts (Whitney et al 2013;Minasi et al 2016;Su et al 2016;Kaing et al 2018;Werland et al 2017;Tiegs et al 2019;Hernandez-Neito et al 2019;McDaniel et al 2021). Critics of time-lapse technology would argue that there is little to be gained from the study of cleavage parameters over the day of blastocyst formation using traditional monitoring.…”
Section: Morphokinetics and Ploidymentioning
confidence: 99%