2018
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1804.00495
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transferable Pedestrian Motion Prediction Models at Intersections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, many of those methods either need additional training input in new environments or experience transfer issues. To the best of our knowledge, only a few methods explicitly highlight the performance in new environments outside the training scenario [10], [28], [29], [30]. As we will later describe, our approach explicitly uses only semantic maps as input and there will be no need to adapt the learned models to new environments, described with the same semantic classes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, many of those methods either need additional training input in new environments or experience transfer issues. To the best of our knowledge, only a few methods explicitly highlight the performance in new environments outside the training scenario [10], [28], [29], [30]. As we will later describe, our approach explicitly uses only semantic maps as input and there will be no need to adapt the learned models to new environments, described with the same semantic classes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL, or Inverse Optimal Control, IOC) approaches make use of semantic maps for predicting future human motion [9], [10], [30]. In particular, they use the semantic maps for encoding the features of the reward function.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other extreme, for cases like autonomous driving, the change of environment is connatural to the domain (a moving vehicle constantly changing its location), and the parameters of these models are abundant and highly variable. Thus, these applications need transferable solutions, transferability that is specifically sought by researchers, for instance in LIDAR based localization [157] or pedestrian motion estimation [158]. In any case, and regardless the domain, ITS research is in an incipient stage (probably with the exception of autonomous driving) of developing transferable models, and evaluating this feature, and some machine learning paradigms can help improve this characteristic.…”
Section: E Transferabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inverse planning methods estimate the reward function or action model from observed trajectories using statistical learning techniques, e.g. (Ziebart et al 2009;Kitani et al 2012;Rehder et al 2018;Kuderer et al 2012;Pfeiffer et al 2016;Chung and Huang 2012;Shen et al 2018;Lee et al 2017;Walker et al 2014;Huang et al 2016) Figure 4 shows the publications trends over the last years, color-coded by modeling approach. The number of related works is strongly increasing during the last five years in particular for pattern-and planning-based methods.…”
Section: Modeling Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the detailed methods show that IRL or similar methods are providing powerful tools to learn human behaviors. Furthermore, Shen et al (2018) show that under some particular requirements (i.e. when the feature vector, model parameter and output representation are invariant under a rigid body transformation of the world fixed coordinate frame), IRL is suitable for learning location-independent transferable motion models.…”
Section: Single-agent Inverse Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%