2018 9th Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing (WHISPERS) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/whispers.2018.8747223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transfering Super Resolution Convolutional Neural Network For Remote Sensing Data Sharpening

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ERGAS relies on computing the normalized average error of each band in the enhanced image, therefore, low ERGAS values indicate high quality. Other evaluation metrics include Degree of Distortion (DD) [159], [197], [236], Q2 n [237]- [239], sub-pixel CC [240], and Spectral Angle Error (SAE) [241], [242]. Additionally, some researchers assess the quality of their enhanced HSI by observing the performance of standard classification algorithms on the enhanced HSI as opposed to the GT HSI in terms of Overall Accuracy (OA) and Kappa [243]- [247].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ERGAS relies on computing the normalized average error of each band in the enhanced image, therefore, low ERGAS values indicate high quality. Other evaluation metrics include Degree of Distortion (DD) [159], [197], [236], Q2 n [237]- [239], sub-pixel CC [240], and Spectral Angle Error (SAE) [241], [242]. Additionally, some researchers assess the quality of their enhanced HSI by observing the performance of standard classification algorithms on the enhanced HSI as opposed to the GT HSI in terms of Overall Accuracy (OA) and Kappa [243]- [247].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%