1995
DOI: 10.1016/0038-1098(95)00244-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transferred hyperfine interaction and zero field splitting of the Gd3+ ion in KY3F10

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This fact convincingly shows that the superposition model of SH for Gd 3 § cannot be a basis for discussion of correlation between the SH and the CF parameters. The nega-Correspond to the SH of symmetry D 3d• only the relative signs of B LM are determined.tive sign of B4c for such complicated coordination complexes as an antiprism [Gd(4F + 4F)][28] (the antiprism can result from cube by relative rotation of two parallel basis on 45 o) and[GdFg] …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This fact convincingly shows that the superposition model of SH for Gd 3 § cannot be a basis for discussion of correlation between the SH and the CF parameters. The nega-Correspond to the SH of symmetry D 3d• only the relative signs of B LM are determined.tive sign of B4c for such complicated coordination complexes as an antiprism [Gd(4F + 4F)][28] (the antiprism can result from cube by relative rotation of two parallel basis on 45 o) and[GdFg] …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Y 3+ may be described as occupying the approximate face centers of a simple cubic lattice with a cube edge half the value of the full structure and located at the vertices of a network of corner-sharing octahedra [1,2,16]. Thus, the impurity Gd 3+ is surrounded by eight nearest F − ions forming an antiprism [GdF 8 ] 5− cluster.…”
Section: Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the host Y-F bonds, four of them are at the distance R 1 (≈2.329Å), the angles θ 1 (≈130.8 • ) and φ 1 (≈45 • ), and the other four at a different distance R 2 (≈2.193 A), the angles θ 2 (≈60 • ) and φ 2 (≈0 • ). Here θ j and φ j (j = 1, 2) denote the polar angles between R j and Z (or C 4 ) and azimuth angles between R j and the X-axes of the crystal, respectively [16]. As mentioned before, the impurity-ligand bonding length R j and angle θ j in the doped crystal may be unlike the host values R j and θ j , because the ionic radius r i (≈0.938Å [17]) of the host Gd 3+ is larger than the radius r h (≈0.893Å [17]) of the host Y 3+ .…”
Section: Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations