2019
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1904918116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transferrin receptor binds virus capsid with dynamic motion

Abstract: Canine parvovirus (CPV) is an important pathogen causing severe diseases in dogs, including acute hemorrhagic enteritis, myocarditis, and cerebellar disease. Cross-species transmission of CPV occurs as a result of mutations on the viral capsid surface that alter the species-specific binding to the host receptor, transferrin receptor type-1 (TfR). The interaction between CPV and TfR has been extensively studied, and previous analyses have suggested that the CPV-TfR complex is asymmetric. To enhance the understa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(105 reference statements)
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may result in a change to the molecular surface of the core of the receptor-binding region, subsequently influencing receptor-binding affinity between the transferrin receptor and the virus. In addition, our data agree with previous studies indicating that residue 101 is located not only at the core of the receptor-binding region (Lee et al, 2019) but also at the antibody-binding site (Organtini et al, 2016). Taken together, the impact of the Thr101 mutation will require further investigation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This may result in a change to the molecular surface of the core of the receptor-binding region, subsequently influencing receptor-binding affinity between the transferrin receptor and the virus. In addition, our data agree with previous studies indicating that residue 101 is located not only at the core of the receptor-binding region (Lee et al, 2019) but also at the antibody-binding site (Organtini et al, 2016). Taken together, the impact of the Thr101 mutation will require further investigation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Viruses classified within the same Baltimore group can use the same receptors for cell infection, which is in contrast with our canonical understanding that identical entry receptors are utilized by viruses from the same taxonomic family (e.g. TfR is utilized by members of the Parvoviridae family such as FPV and CPV during infection (Lofling et al 2013;Lee et al 2019). Take TfR as an example, the PCV, which belongs to the Circoviridae family, shares the same Baltimore group II with the CPV that also uses TfR as the receptor (Misinzo 2005).…”
Section: Opportunities and Challengesmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…It falls within a region of the capsid structure that stabilizes a loop containing VP2 residues 300 and 301, which interact directly with the TfR (Fig. 7B) (30). By removing a hydrogen bond interacting with this loop, the VP2 Arg81Thr substitution likely permits greater flexibility of the capsid.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such mutations likely reflect adaptation of the viruses in overcoming host barriers to infection or optimizing their interactions with TfR binding sites (19). Recently, the TfR-CPV interaction has been further defined using cryo-electron microscopy (cryoEM) (30), providing atomic resolution structural information of the viral capsid-host cell receptor interface.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%