This paper is at the crossroads of two branches of urban studies. On the one hand, research on residential segregation leans heavily towards the analysis of those who have little choice in deciding where to live. (1) On the other hand, the literature on gated communities tends to assume rather than empirically evaluate their impact on increasing segregation, ignoring contextual variations. (2) I connect these two traditions through the study of a particular group of the affluent who have recently moved to gated communities in Montevideo and its metropolitan area. In the first part of this paper I explain the rationale and findings of this study. Empirical similarities between my findings and those of studies of an apparently very different type of affluent residency, inner-city gentrification, lead to the more theoretical second part of the paper developed in the conclusion.
The gated-communities^segregation debateA gated community is a residential development with restricted access, which often includes a guard and other forms of private surveillance. Fences or other types of barriers enclose houses, streets, sidewalks, and other amenities. Although in the title of this paper I call gated communities`golden ghettos' öborrowing this expression from Giroir (2003)öI use the word`ghetto' more as a powerful metaphor than as a sociological concept. Wacquant (2004) and Marcuse (1997) have helped to clarify the sociological meaning of ghetto as an involuntarily spatially concentrated area. Clearly, gated communities do not fit this definition. Since their confinement is voluntary, and their residents occupy a position of superiority in power, wealth, and/or status