2008
DOI: 10.1021/jf8018886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transformation and Sorption of Fipronil in Urban Stream Sediments

Abstract: Fipronil is an urban-use insecticide, and the increased use has led to its frequent detections in urban streams. Most studies on the environmental fate of fipronil so far have focused on soils, and little is known about its behavior in sediment-water systems. In this study, we investigated the transformation and sorption of fipronil in urban stream sediments from California, incubated under facultative and anaerobic conditions. Degradation of fipronil in sediments generally followed exponential decay kinetics,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
43
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(41 reference statements)
4
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The spatial pattern of fipronil contamination also coincided with pyrethroids, with the highest P FIP occurring at correlated with sediment fines (R s ¼ 0.79; p < 0.01; n ¼ 12), but was not correlated with TOC (R s ¼ 0.31; p < 0.2; n ¼ 18). In the absence of usage data to assess occurrence and persistence, the lower hydrophobicity and sediment-water partition coefficients for fipronil and its degradates compared with pyrethroids [32][33][34] can explain these trends.…”
Section: Fipronil and Its Degradatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spatial pattern of fipronil contamination also coincided with pyrethroids, with the highest P FIP occurring at correlated with sediment fines (R s ¼ 0.79; p < 0.01; n ¼ 12), but was not correlated with TOC (R s ¼ 0.31; p < 0.2; n ¼ 18). In the absence of usage data to assess occurrence and persistence, the lower hydrophobicity and sediment-water partition coefficients for fipronil and its degradates compared with pyrethroids [32][33][34] can explain these trends.…”
Section: Fipronil and Its Degradatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pesticides may reach surface water through various pathways, such as atmospheric deposition, surface runoff, and sewage drainage (Lin et al, 2008;Jiang and Gan, 2012). As a consequence, pesticide pollution in aquatic ecosystems has gained worldwide awareness because of their ubiquity in the environment and potential risk to aquatic organisms and human health (Beketov et al, 2013;Malaj et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to NASS (2008), from 2001 to 2005 approximately 30,000 kg year -1 of fipronil was used on agricultural crops in the US for pest management. As a result, there is a high probability for fipronil and metabolite run-off from agricultural land, entering waterways and mobilizing to sediments (Gunasekara et al 2007) where these compounds can be moderately persistant (Lin et al 2008). Within waterways such as drainage ditches, wetlands, or sediment retention ponds, the presence of emergent aquatic plants such as Typha latifolia L. and Thallia dealbata Fraser ex Roscoe could be useful in mitigating fipronil and metabolite contamination of water and sediment (Kröger and Moore 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within waterways such as drainage ditches, wetlands, or sediment retention ponds, the presence of emergent aquatic plants such as Typha latifolia L. and Thallia dealbata Fraser ex Roscoe could be useful in mitigating fipronil and metabolite contamination of water and sediment (Kröger and Moore 2008). However, due to the paucity of published data regarding fipronil and metabolite contamination, bioavailability and risk to benthic aquatic biota in waterway sediments (Gunasekara et al 2007;Lin et al 2008;Maul et al 2008) the effects of fipronil and metabolite sediment contamination on sedimentassociated aquatic organisms is in need of assessment. This study assessed chronic 28-days effects of fipronil and metabolite contaminated sediments from non-vegetated and T. dealbata vegetated wetland microcosms on Hyalella azteca during wet and dry exposures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%