2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.05.337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transformation behavior and inverse caloric effects in magnetic shape memory Ni44-xCuxCo6Mn39Sn11 ribbons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have found that Cu addition instead of Ni causes an increase of the lattice parameter a c of austenite and consequently the unit cell volume. Thus, independently of the fabrication method, alloys with the same chemical composition show alike behavior . Moreover, small amount of Cu (1 and 2 at.%) slightly decreases thermal hysteresis, which is very important from practical point of view.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have found that Cu addition instead of Ni causes an increase of the lattice parameter a c of austenite and consequently the unit cell volume. Thus, independently of the fabrication method, alloys with the same chemical composition show alike behavior . Moreover, small amount of Cu (1 and 2 at.%) slightly decreases thermal hysteresis, which is very important from practical point of view.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is seen that there is an increase in the parameter a with increasing the Cu content, which indicates an expansion in the unit cell. If we consider that Cu 2+ atoms occupy exactly Ni 2+ sites, we believe that this expansion in the unit cell is caused by larger ionic radius of Cu 2 + (0.128 nm) than that of Ni 2 + (0.125 nm) [29].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the result of M–T curves, the characteristic temperatures from DSC show some differences, which would probably attribute to the different sample sizes and heating and cooling rates . In addition, a thermal hysteresis can also be confirmed by the difference between M s and A f, implying a first‐order phase transition . The ΔS can be estimated by the relationship Δ S = Δ H / T 0 , where T 0 is the equilibrium temperature defined as ( M s + A f )/ 2 , and the ΔH is calculated as the areas of exothermic or endothermic peaks.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%