2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00180-020-01009-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transformation mixture modeling for skewed data groups with heavy tails and scatter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is immediate to see that the probability density function (pdf) of X can be written as ffalse(x;bold-italicθfalse)=ϕfalse(scriptTfalse(x;λfalse);μ,σ2false)JscriptTfalse(x;λfalse), where bold-italicθ=false(μ,σ2,λfalse), ϕfalse(·false) represents a normal pdf and JscriptTfalse(x;λfalse)=false|dscriptTfalse(x;λfalse)false/dxfalse| is the transformation‐specific Jacobian. However, as noted in Melnykov et al (2021), the original objective of transformations was to reduce skewness rather than reach normality. Hence, using the notions of symmetry and normality interchangeably can lead to unsatisfactory results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is immediate to see that the probability density function (pdf) of X can be written as ffalse(x;bold-italicθfalse)=ϕfalse(scriptTfalse(x;λfalse);μ,σ2false)JscriptTfalse(x;λfalse), where bold-italicθ=false(μ,σ2,λfalse), ϕfalse(·false) represents a normal pdf and JscriptTfalse(x;λfalse)=false|dscriptTfalse(x;λfalse)false/dxfalse| is the transformation‐specific Jacobian. However, as noted in Melnykov et al (2021), the original objective of transformations was to reduce skewness rather than reach normality. Hence, using the notions of symmetry and normality interchangeably can lead to unsatisfactory results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%