2007
DOI: 10.1109/fuzzy.2007.4295331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transformation of a Mamdani FIS to First Order Sugeno FIS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mamdani & Assilian, 1975;Takagi & Sugeno, 1985), which contains a specific algorithm assigning new, 'fuzzified' values to input variables. Many authors have written on the subject of fuzzy regulators, base rules and linguistic variables (Guney & Sarikaya, 2009;Jassbi et al, 2007;Schlegel, 2002;Talašová, 2003).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mamdani & Assilian, 1975;Takagi & Sugeno, 1985), which contains a specific algorithm assigning new, 'fuzzified' values to input variables. Many authors have written on the subject of fuzzy regulators, base rules and linguistic variables (Guney & Sarikaya, 2009;Jassbi et al, 2007;Schlegel, 2002;Talašová, 2003).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main disadvantage of the ANFIS is the fact that it uses the Takagi-Sugeno FIS ( [18]). Takagi-Sugeno FIS have lower interpretability when compared to Mamdani FIS ( [20], [19]). …”
Section: A Anfismentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The TSK method has been shown to be superior with respect to computational time than the rival Mamdani method (Jassbi et al 2006). It is also more robust and accurate in working with noisy data as compared to the Mamdani method (Jassbi et al 2007). Additionally, impact assessment models, which are used to derive the equivalence factors for different emissions, have inherent uncertainties.…”
Section: Characterizing Data Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 97%