1989
DOI: 10.1104/pp.91.3.1212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transformation of Soybean (Glycine max) by Infecting Germinating Seeds with Agrobacterium tumefaciens

Abstract: The transfer of genetic material into soybean tissue was accomplished by using an avirulent strain of Agrobacterlum tumefaciens which contained the binary vector pGA482. The method used for transformation requires no tissue culture steps as it involves the inoculation of the plumule, cotyledonary node, and adjacent cotyledon tissues of germinating seeds. The identification of neomycin phosphotransferase (NPT) II enzyme activity in the tissues of 16 (Ro) soybean plants indicated that the plant expressible Nos-N… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
44
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The advantage of wounding, compared to acetosyringone, is that besides increasing the accessibility to target tissue for Agrobacterium, it can also enhance other inducers of T-DNA transfer. Different types of wounding include simple wounds made during the normal course of explant prepara-doi: 10.17221/177/2016-CJGPB tion (Horsch et al 1985), particle gun-mediated micro-wounding (Bidney et al 1992), using syringes filled with Agrobacterium (Chee et al 1989), and the use of sonication (Trick & Finer 1997). Sonication can overcome barriers of the host specificity and the inability of Agrobacterium to reach the proper cells in the target tissue and thus enhances DNA transfer (Trick & Finer 1997).…”
Section: Sonication-assisted Agrobacterium-mediated Transformation (Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of wounding, compared to acetosyringone, is that besides increasing the accessibility to target tissue for Agrobacterium, it can also enhance other inducers of T-DNA transfer. Different types of wounding include simple wounds made during the normal course of explant prepara-doi: 10.17221/177/2016-CJGPB tion (Horsch et al 1985), particle gun-mediated micro-wounding (Bidney et al 1992), using syringes filled with Agrobacterium (Chee et al 1989), and the use of sonication (Trick & Finer 1997). Sonication can overcome barriers of the host specificity and the inability of Agrobacterium to reach the proper cells in the target tissue and thus enhances DNA transfer (Trick & Finer 1997).…”
Section: Sonication-assisted Agrobacterium-mediated Transformation (Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chee et al (1989) used a needle to inoculate the plumule, cotyledonary node, and adjacent cotyledonary tissue with Agrobacterium. Only 0.7% of the inoculated seeds yielded transformed tissues.…”
Section: Choosing the Targetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limited success has been reported with Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of seeds, somatic embryos, colyledonary nodes, and immature zygotic cotyledons (Hinchee et al, 1988;Chee et al, 1989;Parrott, et al 1989;Townsend & Thomas, 1993;Meurer, 1998;Yan et al, 2000;Gelvin, 2003).…”
Section: Transformation Using Agrobacterium-mediated Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soybean transformation has been difficult, but several methods have been recently developed using Agrobacterium [1][2][3], microprojectile bombardment [4][5][6][7], or electroporation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%