1983
DOI: 10.1029/jc088ic10p05925
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transformation of wave height distribution

Abstract: The transformation of random wave heights during shoaling, including waves breaking in the surf zone, was measured with an extensive array of instruments in the field. The initially Rayleigh height distributions in 10‐m depth were observed to be modified by shoaling and breaking into new distributions which are again nearly Rayleigh but with some energy loss. Using locally measured Hrms, the Rayleigh distribution describes the measured central moments of H1/3 and H1/10 with average errors of −0.2% and −1.8%, r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
574
2
6

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 746 publications
(594 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
12
574
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, overprediction of wave breaking dissipation by the analytical model is not surprising. The use of the bore dissipation formulation [Thornton and Guza, 1983] worked well for surf zone dissipation when weighted by a breaking wave height probability distribution that had been verified using surf zone data. It is not expected that the distribution would necessarily work well for greater depths where bottom-induced breaking seldom occurs.…”
Section: Dissipation Of Shoaling Swell: a Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, overprediction of wave breaking dissipation by the analytical model is not surprising. The use of the bore dissipation formulation [Thornton and Guza, 1983] worked well for surf zone dissipation when weighted by a breaking wave height probability distribution that had been verified using surf zone data. It is not expected that the distribution would necessarily work well for greater depths where bottom-induced breaking seldom occurs.…”
Section: Dissipation Of Shoaling Swell: a Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17] The cross-shore distribution of physical wave parameters (wave energy, seabed orbital velocity, alongshore wave energy flux) for studying the influence of waves on the bottom sediments were calculated for the open coast sites following equations from Komar [1998] with the influence of breaking in the surf-zone modeled using the method presented by Thornton and Guza [1983]. The model was initialized using wave data over seven years (23 Sept. 2003-02 June 2010) from the Pukehina wave buoy located to the southeast of the study area (37.3812 S, 176.947 E) in 62 m water depth.…”
Section: Wave Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given an arbitrary depth profile and offshore wave statistics, a simple wave transformation model [e.g., Thornton and Guza, 1983] can be used to predict the rms wave height over the entire profile. Thus it is possible to predict the values of o-, (via (5)) and y (via (7) Bagnold [1963] assumed that the mean normal stress exerted by the weight of the bed load is supported, on average, by the mean tangential stress.…”
Section: Sediment Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%