2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transformational and charismatic leadership: Assessing the convergent, divergent and criterion validity of the MLQ and the CKS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
166
1
7

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(182 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
8
166
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Various studies have found high inter-correlations between the sub-dimensions of transformational leadership (Avolio, Bass, & Jung, 1999;Bycio et al, 1995;Carless, 1998;Rowold & Heinitz, 2007), which supports the unidimensional solution revealed by our data. The unidimensionality of the construct and the high factor loadings obtained for all the items in five different samples implies that the four subdimensions must be present in order for a leader to show transformational leadership.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Various studies have found high inter-correlations between the sub-dimensions of transformational leadership (Avolio, Bass, & Jung, 1999;Bycio et al, 1995;Carless, 1998;Rowold & Heinitz, 2007), which supports the unidimensional solution revealed by our data. The unidimensionality of the construct and the high factor loadings obtained for all the items in five different samples implies that the four subdimensions must be present in order for a leader to show transformational leadership.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Moreover, added the category of Laissez-faire to another style and separated the idealized influence factor into attributed idealized influence factor and behavior idealized influence factor. After 1995, Several researchers Avolio, 1996, 1997;Bass, 1997;Den Hartog et al, 1997;Bass et al, 1999;Goodwin, Wofford, & Whittington, 2001;Antonakis, et al,2003;Bass, Avolio, Jung, & Berson,2003;Barbuto Jr., 2005;Rowold & Heinitz, 2007) have still used the nine factors version to based on the several researches while some researchers had recommended additions or deletions the items of factors from nine factors model for their studies (Bass, Avolio, and Jung, 1995;Lowe et al,1996;Avolio and Bass, 1997;Bass,1996aBass, , 1998Avolo, Bass, and Jung, 1999;Dumdum et al, 2002;Judge and Piccolo, 2004).Until, revised the latest version of a nine-factor or full range of leadership model which consists five factors of transformational leadership style as: idealized influence (attributed), idealized influence (behavior), inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation, and individualized consideration; two factors of transactional leadership styles as: contingent reward and management-by-exception (active); and two factors of passive-avoidant leadership style as: management-by-exception (passive) and laissez-faire leadership style.…”
Section: The Full-range Of Leadership Theory (Nine Factors Model Of Lmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wide range of psychological and management studies have used Bass and Avolio"s [19,44] multifactor leadership questionnaire (MLQ) to measure transformational leadership, and proved its validity [45,46]. However, the adoption and perception of leadership style are highly subject to national cultures, especially in countries with high power distance and a highly collectivistic culture, such as China [47].…”
Section: B Measurement Of Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%