“…As a result, 13 studies were of high methodological quality because all of these papers received a “yes” rating for all relevant elements of the JBI Quality Assessment Tool ( Abdelhafiz et al, 2016 ; Abualrub & Alghamdi, 2012 ; Alshahrani & Baig, 2016 ; Asif et al, 2019 ; Boamah et al, 2018 ; Brewer et al, 2016 ; Choi et al, 2016 ; Jankelová & Joniaková, 2021 ; Labrague et al, 2020 ; Morsiani et al, 2017 ; Negussie & Demissie, 2013 ; Othman & Khrais, 2022 ; Roberts-Turner et al, 2014 ). And, four studies ( Albagawi, 2019 ; Quesado et al, 2022 ; Sahan & Terzioglu, 2022 ; Wang et al, 2012 ) were of moderate methodological quality due to their limitations in having a standardized objective and, identification and management of confounding factors (Appendix B). No article was excluded based on this data evaluation rating system.…”