2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.11.163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transformations for linear parameter varying systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The scheduling parameters are bounded and known (their current values ρ(k) can be measured online or estimated) -note that their future behaviour is generally not known. Theoretical analysis of LPV system properties, such as stability, observability, controllability, often falls into the framework of linear timevarying systems or of nonlinear systems, which usually presents more difficulty compared to the classical LTI framework (Blanchini & Miani, 2003;Bokor & Balas, 2005;Szabó & Bokor, 2018).…”
Section: Linear Parameter Varying Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scheduling parameters are bounded and known (their current values ρ(k) can be measured online or estimated) -note that their future behaviour is generally not known. Theoretical analysis of LPV system properties, such as stability, observability, controllability, often falls into the framework of linear timevarying systems or of nonlinear systems, which usually presents more difficulty compared to the classical LTI framework (Blanchini & Miani, 2003;Bokor & Balas, 2005;Szabó & Bokor, 2018).…”
Section: Linear Parameter Varying Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this terminal cost, is a constant matrix of adequate sizes taken according to LMI (24) and ensuring ISS property and recursive feasibility (explained in the sequel). is also strictly positive definite with rank{ } = .…”
Section: Terminal Costmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(74). It is direct to verify that if LMI holds, since is a scalar and LMI (24) implies the regional decrease of , Axiom A3 is valid. Therefore, is computed such that (24) and (75) hold, being also full-rank and positive definite by definition.…”
Section: Proposition 3 Recursive Feasibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations