2021
DOI: 10.1177/15586898211033698
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transformativist Measurement Development Methodology: A Mixed Methods Approach to Scale Construction

Abstract: Social justice research is popular in education, but social scientists have limited emancipatory methodological procedures, especially in scale construction approaches that empower marginalized communities in defining their own lived experience. Therefore, this study develops the Transformativist Measurement Development Methodology, exemplified using the development of the peer bonds scale. The sample (167 students across two democratic school communities) was randomly selected, then purposive sampled for opti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…School closures tied to COVID-19 mandates highlight the valuable social support that schools (Campione-Barr et al, 2021) provide youths for building caring communities (O'Keefe et al, 2021;Leach Sankofa, 2022). Schools can offer a community of caring (Hussain et al, 2018), contributing significantly to providing hope, creating a sense of belonging (Clausen et al, 2021;Ersan & Rodriguez, 2021;Hussain et al, 2018), and nurturing an academic identity (Martinez, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…School closures tied to COVID-19 mandates highlight the valuable social support that schools (Campione-Barr et al, 2021) provide youths for building caring communities (O'Keefe et al, 2021;Leach Sankofa, 2022). Schools can offer a community of caring (Hussain et al, 2018), contributing significantly to providing hope, creating a sense of belonging (Clausen et al, 2021;Ersan & Rodriguez, 2021;Hussain et al, 2018), and nurturing an academic identity (Martinez, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of mixed methods in instrument development and validation studies has been increasing. It can promote more rigor in the process, optimizing the development of psychometrically sound and culturally sensitive instruments [ 75 , 76 , 77 ]. The combined etic–emic strategy, allowing for the development and adding of the new items, was also valuable to enhance the Icelandic BHS-TR’s construct validity and cultural sensitivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as innovative and valuable their framework has been, it is first and foremost Quan. To date, in the instrument development literature, construct validation is often conceived as mainly a Quan endeavor [ 45 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 ]. When Qual data are used, it is usually only granted a supplementary role to Quan data, and often the methods are utilized in isolation rather than fully integrated [ 50 , 52 , 53 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, there is a growing literature on mixed methods validation. A few frameworks have been developed that place equal value on Quan and Qual methods, focusing on validity and trustworthiness, and emphasizing the integration or “mixing” of findings from both databases to inform validation evidence for a measure [ 49 , 51 , 52 , 54 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%