2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.apnum.2020.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transformed implicit-explicit second derivative diagonally implicit multistage integration methods with strong stability preserving explicit part

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…By using the results from [13, 27, 41], sufficient conditions for an SGLM to preserve the strong stability properties of spatial discretizations, when coupled with forward Euler and a second derivative formulation, were determined by Moradi et al [36]. To describe a numerical search for SSP SGLMs, the authors [36] considered the constrained minimization problem with an objective function subject to the following nonlinear inequality constraints: where is some constant, can take any positive value and These conditions are equivalent to For an SGLM with the coefficient matrices and the abscissa vector c , the SSP coefficient was given by Moradi et al [36] as Considering these conditions leads to a wide variety of SSP SGLMs [3436, 38], where the main drawback of these conditions is that the types of spatial discretizations that can be used are limited. Due to this reason, in this paper, we will consider a different approach to the SSP concept, so that there will be more flexibility in the choice of spatial discretizations.…”
Section: A Short Review On the Ssp Sglmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By using the results from [13, 27, 41], sufficient conditions for an SGLM to preserve the strong stability properties of spatial discretizations, when coupled with forward Euler and a second derivative formulation, were determined by Moradi et al [36]. To describe a numerical search for SSP SGLMs, the authors [36] considered the constrained minimization problem with an objective function subject to the following nonlinear inequality constraints: where is some constant, can take any positive value and These conditions are equivalent to For an SGLM with the coefficient matrices and the abscissa vector c , the SSP coefficient was given by Moradi et al [36] as Considering these conditions leads to a wide variety of SSP SGLMs [3436, 38], where the main drawback of these conditions is that the types of spatial discretizations that can be used are limited. Due to this reason, in this paper, we will consider a different approach to the SSP concept, so that there will be more flexibility in the choice of spatial discretizations.…”
Section: A Short Review On the Ssp Sglmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using this type of condition, Christlieb et al [13] derived SSP two-derivative RK methods up to order six, which preserve the strong stability properties of the forward Euler condition (1.3) when coupled with the second derivative condition (1.4). Moradi et al [36], using the general order conditions for second derivative general linear methods (SGLMs) derived in [37], extended this SSP approach to characterize and design SSP SGLMs as a class of multistage second derivative time discretization and investigated more in [34, 35, 38]. The main flaw of this approach is that the types of spatial discretizations that can be used are limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…u(x) = r(k(2x − 1) sinh(kx) + 2 cosh(kx) tanh( k 2 )) 2k 3 is the exact solution of example 5.1, and the numerical results are given in Table 1. u (4) − 2u = −1 − (8π 4 − 1) cos(2πx), x ∈ (0, 1) u(0) = u(1) = u (0) = u (1) = 0. Table 2 and figure 2 lists the errors comparison between the multilevel augmentation method [30] and our method for this BVPs…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is difficult to find the analytic solutions of higher-order BVPs because of the complexity of the systems, many numerical algorithms for high-order BVPs have been proposed in recent years. The multistage integration method is an important method to solve the numerical solution of higher-order models by reducing the order gradually [2][3][4][5]. Cao [6] solved a class of higher-order fractional ordinary differential equations by the quadratic interpolation function method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por otra parte, los métodos implícitos para solucionar ecuaciones diferenciales ordinarias tienden a tener regiones de estabilidad que contienen a gran parte del plano complejo, lo cual permite su implementación en sistemas diferenciales tipo Stiff [10,13]. A pesar de su naturaleza, su ejecución es bastante costosa computacionalmente, ya que implica la solución en simultaneo de un número elevado de ecuaciones [10,14].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified