Transformed mycosis fungoides: clinicopathological features and outcome

195

182

Large cell transformation (LCT) in mycosis fungoides (MF) is generally associated with an aggressive clinical course and poor survival, requiring aggressive therapeutic approach. However, a proportion of cases may follow an indolent clinical course. To identify prognostic factors, we analyzed the prognostic relevance of clinical, histologic, and immunophenotypical features in a large cohort of transformed MF patients, including 75 patients with only skin lesions, 19 patients with LCT in skin and lymph nodes, and 6 patients with LCT in lymph nodes only. Multivariate analysis of the total group showed that CD30 negativity, folliculotropic MF, extent of skin lesions and extracutaneous transformation were associated with reduced disease-specific survival (DSS) and, except for CD30 negativity and folliculotropic MF, also overall survival. In a multivariate analysis of 75 patients with only skin lesions at the time of LCT, CD30 negativity, folliculotropic MF and extent of skin lesions were independent parameters for both DSS and overall survival. Using the most discriminating parameters as a prognostic index, in both study groups differences in DSS between patients with 0-1 unfavorable prognostic factor(s) and > 2 unfavorable prognostic factors were statistically significant (P < .001). This prognostic index may be helpful in predicting prognosis and selecting the most appropriate treatment in patients with transformed MF. (Blood. 2012; 119(7):1643-1649)

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prognostic factors in transformed mycosis fungoides: a retrospective analysis of 100 cases

Benner¹,

Jansen

Vermeer³

et al. 2012

195

182

“…There are limited preliminary data to indicate that some patients with advanced-stage disease in whom the large cells express CD30 may have a more indolent course. 9,120 For the younger patient, systemic chemotherapy is initiated early and consideration should be made for autologous or allogeneic transplantation. Consolidative radiation therapy should be considered in young patients with unifocal transformation.…”

Section: Transformed Diseasementioning

confidence: 99%

How I treat mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome

Prince

Whittaker

Hoppe

2009

136

109

The most common subtypes of primary cutaneous T-cell lymphomas are mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sézary syndrome (SS). The majority of patients have indolent disease; and given the incurable nature of MF/SS, management should focus on improving symptoms and cosmesis while limiting toxicity. Management of MF/SS should use a “stage-based” approach; treatment of early-stage disease (IA-IIA) typically involves skin directed therapies that include topical corticosteroids, phototherapy (psoralen plus ultraviolet A radiation or ultraviolet B radiation), topical chemotherapy, topical or systemic bexarotene, and radiotherapy. Systemic approaches are used for recalcitrant early-stage disease, advanced-stage disease (IIB-IV), and transformed disease and include retinoids, such as bexarotene, interferon-α, histone deacetylase inhibitors, the fusion toxin denileukin diftitox, systemic chemotherapy including transplantation, and extracorporeal photopheresis. Examples of drugs under active investigation include new histone deacetylase inhibitors, forodesine, monoclonal antibodies, proteasome inhibitors, and immunomodulatory agents, such as lenalidomide. It is appropriate to consider patients for novel agents within clinical trials if they have failed front-line therapy and before chemotherapy is used.

“…15,89 In addition, CD30 expression does not indicate a primary cutaneous anaplastic large-cell lymphoma when the patient has a preceding history of MF.…”

Section: Commentmentioning

confidence: 99%

How I treat mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome

Prince

Whittaker

Hoppe

2016

149

Mycosis fungoides (MF) is the most common primary cutaneous T-cell lymphoma variant and is closely related to a rare leukemic variant, Sézary syndrome (SS). MF patients at risk of disease progression can now be identified and an international consortium has been established to address the prognostic relevance of specific biologic factors and define a prognostic index. There are a lack of randomized clinical trial data in MF/SS and evidence is based on a traditional “stage-based” approach; treatment of early-stage disease (IA-IIA) involves skin directed therapies which include topical corticosteroids, phototherapy (psoralen with UVA or UVB), topical chemotherapy, topical bexarotene, and radiotherapy including total skin electron beam therapy. Systemic approaches are used for refractory early-stage and advanced-stage disease (IIB-IV) and include bexarotene, interferon α, extracorporeal photopheresis, histone deacetylase inhibitors, and antibody therapies such as alemtuzumab, systemic chemotherapy, and allogeneic transplantation. However, despite the number of biologic agents available, the treatment of advanced-stage disease still represents an unmet medical need with short duration of responses. Encouragingly, randomized phase 3 trials are assessing novel agents, including brentuximab vedotin and the anti-CCR4 antibody, mogamulizumab. A broader understanding of the biology of MF/SS will hopefully identify more effective targeted therapies.