1951
DOI: 10.1109/ee.1951.6437380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transformer magnetizing inrush currents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Boşta çalışma akımı cer transformatörü enerjilendirildikten sonra geçici durumun bitmesi halinde çekilen akım formudur. Bu akım formu nüve özelliklerine, uyarma gerilimine ve modelin geometrik yapısına bağlıdır [36]. Uygun analiz ayarları ile birlikte Şekil-6 üzerinde gösterilen boşta çalışma akımı bulunabilmektedir.…”
Section: Boşta çAlışma Akımıunclassified
“…Boşta çalışma akımı cer transformatörü enerjilendirildikten sonra geçici durumun bitmesi halinde çekilen akım formudur. Bu akım formu nüve özelliklerine, uyarma gerilimine ve modelin geometrik yapısına bağlıdır [36]. Uygun analiz ayarları ile birlikte Şekil-6 üzerinde gösterilen boşta çalışma akımı bulunabilmektedir.…”
Section: Boşta çAlışma Akımıunclassified
“…This is a common practice when performing sensitivity analysis specially if the transformer has not been built or purchased. Such "reference inrush current" may be due to field data from similar transformers, worst-case scenario calculations such as [31], [32], or even empirical values 2 . In such cases, it is possible to run multiple EMT simulations and experimentally adjust L air until matching inrush current is simulated.…”
Section: E Parameter Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results are summarized in Table 4 in terms of the peak values. For comparison, the table also includes simulation results from the unified magnetic equivalent circuit (UMEC) model [12], [13] as well as the values provided by the manufacturer based on analytical calculations [31]. However, it should be noted that there are differences in the modeling and calculation techniques presented in Table 4.…”
Section: ) Worst-case Remanencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large difference between the actual grid and sub-inverter output voltages owing to the time delay can result in an offset in the transformer flux and generate an inrush current owing to the saturation phenomenon. The inrush current could be several times higher than the rated current of the inverter [34,35], and overcurrent protection may get activated when the sub-inverter is operated. Figure 4 shows the experimental waveforms of the inrush current as a function of the load voltage generated during inverter start-up, when fast system recovery control is used under a 10 kW load condition.…”
Section: System Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%