Transforming environmental governance: critical action intellectuals and their praxis in the field

Abstract

Over the past decade, widespread concern has emerged over how environmental governance can be transformed to avoid impending catastrophes such as climate change, biodiversity loss, and livelihood insecurity. A variety of approaches have emerged, focusing on either politics, technological breakthrough, social movements, or macro-economic processes as the main drivers of change. In contrast, this paper presents theoretical insights about how systemic change in environmental governance can be triggered by critical and intellectually grounded social actors in specific contexts of environment and development. Conceptualising such actors as critical action intellectuals (CAI), we analyze how CAI emerge in specific socio-environmental contexts and contribute to systemic change in governance. CAI trigger transformative change by shifting policy discourse, generating alternative evidence, and challenging dominant policy assumptions, whilst aiming to empower marginalized groups. While CAI do not work in a vacuum, nor are the sole force in transformation, we nevertheless show that the praxis of CAI within fields of environmental governance has the potential to trigger transformation. We illustrate this through three cases of natural resource governance in Nepal, Nicaragua and Guatemala, and Kenya, where the authors themselves have engaged as CAI. We contribute to theorising the ‘how’ of transformation by showing the ways CAI praxis reshape fields of governance and catalyze transformation, distinct from, and at times complementary to, other dominant drivers such as social movements, macroeconomic processes or technological breakthroughs.

Climate justice in higher education: a proposed paradigm shift towards a transformative role for colleges and universities

“…The inadequacy of how most universities are responding to both racism and the climate crisis demonstrates how higher education is reinforcing rather than disrupting the concentration of wealth and power (including white supremacy and the influence of fossil fuel interests). To advance a just societal transition away from worsening climate suffering, the dominant knowledge paradigms on which current societal systems were built must be challenged (Ojha et al 2022 ). Recent efforts by US colleges and universities to establish courses and curriculum centering diversity, equity, and inclusion demonstrate how these efforts are largely oriented toward the experiences of white people (Abrica et al 2021 ; Gonzales et al 2021 ).…”

Implementing post-normal science with or for EU policy actors: using quantitative story-telling

“…It is difficult to balance a critique of the status quo with a more positive solutions focus; given true transformation often requires wholescale systems change, not incremental policy improvements (Chan et al 2020;Dorninger et al 2020). Our experiences with QST may have been difficult as we were asking for a deep transformation of the socio-ecological system, which challenges the status quo (Ojha et al 2022). Non-state actors may be more willing to discuss the politics of the problems and embrace the challenge (Linnenluecke et al 2017).…”

Fieldwork in conservation organisations–A review of methodological challenges, opportunities and ethics

“…To avoid the impending socio‐ecological crisis, organisations must transform, but in addition to social movements or macro‐level drivers being an answer, scholars in one way or another seem to be making the suggestion for what Ojha et al. (2022) call, Critical Action Intellectuals, who generate alternative evidence, shift policy discourses and challenge assumptions while aiming to empower marginal groups and perspectives from within. We believe organisational ethnographers are well placed as Critical Action Intellectuals, as they understand where in an organisation to make change and, critically, who to do this with.…”