2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2017.03.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transforming response values in small area prediction

Abstract: a b s t r a c tIn real applications of small area estimation, one often encounters data with positive response values. The use of a parametric transformation for positive response values in the Fay-Herriot model is proposed for such a case. An asymptotically unbiased small area predictor is derived and a second-order unbiased estimator of the mean squared error is established using the parametric bootstrap. Through simulation studies, a finite sample performance of the proposed predictor and the MSE estimator … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Slud and Maiti (2006)) and data-driven transformations (e.g. Sugasawa and Kubokawa (2017)). Rojas-Perilla et al (2020) presented theoretical and numerical justifications for the use of data-driven transformations with unit-level SAE models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Slud and Maiti (2006)) and data-driven transformations (e.g. Sugasawa and Kubokawa (2017)). Rojas-Perilla et al (2020) presented theoretical and numerical justifications for the use of data-driven transformations with unit-level SAE models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equation (1) is estimated using θ true^ d * as the direct estimate and var( θ true^ d * ) as the estimate for the sampling error variance. To bring the estimated EBLUP and MSE back from the transformed to the original scale, we advise a bias correction (Slud and Maiti 2006; Sugawasa and Kubokawa 2017). includes two back-transformation methods: the “crude” method, shown in Neves, Silva, and Correa (2013) and Rao and Molina (2015), and (as the default) the bias correction proposed by Slud and Maiti (2006).…”
Section: The Fh Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DP transformation is described as HλDPfalse(xfalse)=xλxλ2λ,1emx>0,2.56804pt2.56804ptλ>0, where limλ02ptHλDPfalse(xfalse)=logx. In the context of small area estimation, the classical Fay–Herriot model has been extended by Sugasawa and Kubokawa () with the use of DP transformation. It is easy to confirm that the range of DP transformation is double-struckR.…”
Section: Adaptively Transformed Mixed‐model Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%