2019
DOI: 10.5590/jerap.2019.09.1.13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transforming Schools: The Power of Teachers’ Input in Professional Development

Abstract: Recent legislative actions have mandated the professional development of teachers in hopes of improved student achievement. However, research has shown that mandated professional development most usually does not lead to a positive outcome. This article describes three aspects that have been identified as contributing to the transformation of instruction in schools: school context, role of the administrator, and cohesion between professional development and needs of students/teachers. Mezirow’s adult learning … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The teacher objectives and primary educational supports shift across each phase, with Phase 1 focused on problem solving and goal setting, Phase 2 on goal attainment and self-management, and Phase 3 on self-evaluation and decision making. The slightly decreasing trend in teacher reports of fidelity suggests that additional supports for later stages of the model may be needed in practice, perhaps through specific coaching (Snyder, Hemmeter, & Fox, 2015) or ongoing professional development activities (Martin, Kragler, Quatroche, & Bauserman, 2014). In contrast, coaches rated the implementation quality and responsiveness of students to the SDLMI as increasing slightly over time, suggesting that practice and fluency with the intervention may be important to enhance teachers’ ability to shift their instruction from teacher-directed to student-directed and promote high levels of student engagement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The teacher objectives and primary educational supports shift across each phase, with Phase 1 focused on problem solving and goal setting, Phase 2 on goal attainment and self-management, and Phase 3 on self-evaluation and decision making. The slightly decreasing trend in teacher reports of fidelity suggests that additional supports for later stages of the model may be needed in practice, perhaps through specific coaching (Snyder, Hemmeter, & Fox, 2015) or ongoing professional development activities (Martin, Kragler, Quatroche, & Bauserman, 2014). In contrast, coaches rated the implementation quality and responsiveness of students to the SDLMI as increasing slightly over time, suggesting that practice and fluency with the intervention may be important to enhance teachers’ ability to shift their instruction from teacher-directed to student-directed and promote high levels of student engagement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, teachers are expected to develop both individually and professionally to meet the requirements of the current age as well as to increase the performance of their institutions (Aydın, 2011a;Omar, 2014). Over time, the professional development process can lead to the transformation of teachers' beliefs and teaching practices, which allows them to focus on changes that will ultimately increase the success of their students' (Martin et al, 2019). From this point of view, professional development can be defined in the most general terms as the development of teacher skills and efficiencies which produce important educational results for students (Hassel, 1999; as cited in Pharis et al, 2019).…”
Section: The Concept Of Professional Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important component of incorporating practices in the classroom is ensuring teachers have training on evidence-based practices in literacy instruction (Martin et al, 2014). Providing professional development on the use of data to inform literacy practices leads to increased student achievement (Gambrell et al, 2011).…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RTI framework is a process in which data are used to identify supports students need to be successful (Iowa Department of Education, 2011). Along with top-down reform comes the need for staff development for whole school change (Martin et al, 2014). Helping teachers to implement the RTI process is essential to ensuring students are matched to effective, evidence-based interventions (Meyer & Behar-Horenstein, 2015).…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%