2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11625-020-00846-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transforming sustainability science for practice: a social–ecological systems framework for training sustainability professionals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Limitations within the process restrict solutions and systems-level interventions as mechanisms to address negative impacts. Within the Innovations at the Nexus of Food, Energy, and Water Systems (INFEWS) project in Magic Valley, researchers achieved this integration of solutions per each scenario as the interventions reflected stakeholder-defined values and interest [6,7,[22][23][24].…”
Section: Social Ecological Systems Solutions In Scenario Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limitations within the process restrict solutions and systems-level interventions as mechanisms to address negative impacts. Within the Innovations at the Nexus of Food, Energy, and Water Systems (INFEWS) project in Magic Valley, researchers achieved this integration of solutions per each scenario as the interventions reflected stakeholder-defined values and interest [6,7,[22][23][24].…”
Section: Social Ecological Systems Solutions In Scenario Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stakeholder-defined scenarios [9,10,15] intend to acquire greater acceptance from planners and decision-makers; however, formulating said scenarios requires active stakeholder engagement [16][17][18]. Through stakeholder engagement, synthesized assumptions about systems of the region can be organized into descriptive and spatio-temporal scenarios with embedded solutions [14,19].…”
Section: Stakeholder Engagement In Fewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current practices in science communication and visualization lack effective use of explanatory mechanisms to engage stakeholders while simultaneously providing an evaluative tool for further research development [25,26]. This research proposes an assessment through the combination of various graphic representations to address this knowledge gap by providing a means for interactive deep-mapping [13] through the co-production of knowledge in stakeholder engagement [14,16] through graphic visualizations. This project determined a ranking of compelling graphics based on a survey of our stakeholders.…”
Section: Addressing the Knowledge Gap Of Visualizations And Stakehold...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given all these factors, a growing chorus of voices has questioned academia's capability to provide intellectual leadership at all for the sustainability transition. An entire field has emerged -sustainability science -aimed at maintaining the usefulness of science to solving real-world problems (e.g., Polk, 2014;Mooney, 2016;Clark and Harley, 2020;Rocha et al, 2020;Kliskey et al, 2021).…”
Section: A University Unfit For the Anthropocenementioning
confidence: 99%