Although our visual system is extremely good at extracting objects from the visual scene, this process involves complicated computations that are thought to require image processing by many successive cortical areas. Thus, intermediate stages in object extraction should not eliminate essential properties of the objects that are still required by later stages. A particularly important characteristic of an object is its shape, and shape has the property that it is unchanged by translations, rotations, and magnifications of the image. I show that the requirement for this property of shape to be preserved in the image, as represented by the firing of neurons in the primary visual cortex (V1), is equivalent to a particular type of computation, known as a wavelet transform, determining the firing rate of V1 neurons in response to an image on the retina. Experimental data support the conclusion that the neural representation of images in V1 is described by a wavelet transform and, therefore, that the properties of shape are preserved.A well performed mechanical experiment, such as rolling balls down an inclined plane, gives the same result regardless of whether it is done in China or Italy and whether it was done yesterday or centuries ago. The remarkable thing, which was proved by Emmy Noether nearly a century ago, is that this simple observation (i.e., experimental results do not depend on the time or place at which the experiment is done) requires that energy and momentum must be conserved. This result is an example of what is called a ''symmetry argument'' because doing something, such as carrying out an experiment at a different place or time, has no effect on the result, just as rotating a 4-fold symmetric object such as a square by 90°does not change its appearance. Although arguments of this sort are very common in physics (1), they are rarely used in biology. Here, my goal is to use a symmetry argument to gain insights into how the cortex processes information. I identify abstract properties of an image that should be preserved in the cortical representation of that image (a kind of symmetry argument, because abstract image properties are preserved with cortical processing) and explore the consequences of this preservation for the types of calculations that the cortex can perform.We see the world as filled with objects, but extracting them from the complicated pattern of light and dark that is presented to the retina requires complex computations by a sequence of cortical areas. One of the most important defining characteristics of an object is its shape. Because objects are not extracted in the primary visual cortex (V1) but rather in later areas (2), the representation of an image in V1 should not eliminate the essential properties of objects needed for computations by other areas. I show that this requirement for preserving abstract shape properties (described below) in the cortical representation of images restricts the computations that V1 can carry out to a particular class known as wavelet transforms (3...